JungleSkip
Premium Member
Isn't*Okay, MIB is glowing away anytime soon. Direct your #melt and attention elsewhere.
Isn't*Okay, MIB is glowing away anytime soon. Direct your #melt and attention elsewhere.
It's good to see Universal meeting Disney's wake up from their deep slumber, with added ambitious expansions, instead of resting on their post Potter laurels.
I brought the up in another thread, but is Harry Potter still a big enough property that will bring people to the parks? It doesn't have a lasting appeal like Star Wars or Marvel does. I think it might be overkill at this point. It's been 6 years since the last movie and Fantatic Beasts wasn't exactly a smash hit. People move on to other things.
I disagree. The kids that read those books, in 1997 - are having kids now. They will read them and watch the movies with them, and those groups will be vacationing to uni for the next few decades.I brought the up in another thread, but is Harry Potter still a big enough property that will bring people to the parks? It doesn't have a lasting appeal like Star Wars or Marvel does. I think it might be overkill at this point. It's been 6 years since the last movie and Fantatic Beasts wasn't exactly a smash hit. People move on to other things.
I brought the up in another thread, but is Harry Potter still a big enough property that will bring people to the parks? It doesn't have a lasting appeal like Star Wars or Marvel does. I think it might be overkill at this point. It's been 6 years since the last movie and Fantatic Beasts wasn't exactly a smash hit. People move on to other things.
ET is not confirmed to be staying, just hasn't been included in the existing Nintendo plans.I mean... I think its gotta be MIB/Mummy/T2 if FFL is something different and E.T. is confirmed staying. (I hope it's T2...)
Lol, *narrator voice*: “But it wasn’t.”Sadly yes
MOD NOTE: It wasn't.
NOTHING IS SAFE! Time to freak out. :dance:
As I've said countless times, if it was built before Potter, just assume it's going to close in the next decade.
As I've said countless times, if it was built before Potter, just assume it's going to close in the next decade.
Really don't have an issue with this. I don't see anything wrong with replacing rides and think Disney should do it more often.As I've said countless times, if it was built before Potter, just assume it's going to close in the next decade.
I was referring to Disney's slumber. Universal has been pretty wide awake for the past 7 -8 years.I'm glad they're moving forward more quickly than before, I just don't think they were sleeping. I think they were focusing on room capacity due to increased attendance/future projects, but now Disney's projects have kickstarted the attraction phase.