I have zero connection with the Globe theater, but Comcast/Universal really having something up its sleeves and I'm excited for the potential SLOP ride. I just hope it's an actual practical ride instead of a 3d/4d the trend. The Upper Lot really needs some practical rides there. There's barely any, if little at all.
Ooo... Ok. I knew someone was gonna bring it up eventually.
If i'm being 100% honest, I have BIG problems with SLOP being the 2020 ride. Allow me to explain myself with a overly-detailed rant.
(Btw, that is a awful acronym.)
Now, in my opinion, there are three factors that help determine if a ride in one of the Universal parks is a good or bad addition. I call them the Lower Lot trio for reasons i'll explain in just one moment.
The three factors are:
1. The IP that is present in the ride has high significance and/or a impactful legacy in pop culture.
2. The ride brings someone new and unique visually and/or functionally that separates it from other rides.
3. The IP is perfectly suited for the type of ride it is themed around.
As for the name, i call it that since the rides in the Lower Lot are the perfect examples of these pillars in action.
Jurassic Park: The Ride earns it's place due to it's significance and impact on pop culture. In fact, the other two IPs in the lower lot may not have ever existed without JP.
Revenge of The Mummy doesn't have the cultural impact of Jurassic Park but it makes up for it with a great theme (Ancient Egypt) and a ride system that hasn't been seen in the park before. (Dark Roller Coaster)
Transformers: The Ride isn't as unique as ROTM but the IP that is used is a great fit for a action-filled dark ride.
Unfortunately, SLOP as you call it does not have any of these factors in play.
Pillar 1: Well the film was commercially and critically successful, these feats aren't strong enough that we can accurately predict it won't just become another forgettable film that parents will put on to get their kids to shut up.
Pillar 2: If the ride is centered around a big city similar to the first film, it wouldn't be the first time a metropolis was used as a theme.(Spider-Man)
As for functionality, If you honestly expect a ride based around a animated property created by one of the cheapest film studios around not to be a screen ride, you are either out of your mind or blindingly naive.
Pillar 3: Well the SLOP could work as a exciting simulator ride. Unlike transformers, you are really gonna need to stretch your creative muscles to make this property into a thrilling journey that's worth any line you wait through.
Yeah, so that's my reasoning behind it. Well Universal has shown it can hit it out of the park in the past, it has a track record of looking only in the short-term and not seeing the longevity of a property. This is the company that built a Dudley-Do-Right ride after all.
At the end of the day, when they have only so much space to use, i just want Universal to pick the right properties to put in the park and well SLOP could work, it's not the best choice Universal could make.