Yup, just like I outlined in the videos! Personally...I'm ok with them going for the adrenaline junkies route here and less on the theme. We need another good 70+mph attraction in Orlando and I'm all for inversions!
Agreed. Any word on manufacturer, though? We can't seem to agree around here.Yup, just like I outlined in the videos! Personally...I'm ok with them going for the adrenaline junkies route here and less on the theme. We need another good 70+mph attraction in Orlando and I'm all for inversions!
Small dark ride?I understand why people don’t like thrill machines, even if I disagree with them. I’m just not sure there’s a better use for the plot than this.
Hector and Chester’s It’s A Small Jurassic World Boat Tour?Small dark ride?
Small dark ride?
I understand why people don’t like thrill machines, even if I disagree with them. I’m just not sure there’s a better use for the plot than this.
Sea World a threat?
I give it 5 years after Site B’s opening until they go bankrupt and sell SWO’s land to Universal :thumbsup:
Other Sea Worlds won’t see an effect.
My tweet is too much, I didn’t mean to creep you out
Won’t drive attendance like a (possibly) record breaking coaster will, not to mention Uni having a spotty at best track record with those
Agreed. Any word on manufacturer, though? We can't seem to agree around here.
I know you and I are on the same page about it being a steel multi-launch, but wonder where you are on manufacturer.
I think they got the 2 for 1 deal....but wouldn't be surprised if Mack is an option....would just be way out of left field. I'm giving it like 5% or less chance of B&M...despite my wishes it was. I will say this...give me a Maverick in Florida and I'll be happy.
2 for 1 deal. I like that. :thumbsup:I think they got the 2 for 1 deal....but wouldn't be surprised if Mack is an option....would just be way out of left field. I'm giving it like 5% or less chance of B&M...despite my wishes it was. I will say this...give me a Maverick in Florida and I'll be happy.
your input is great. Thanks!You know...just a guess.
your input is great. Thanks!
All indications are it’s heading right in front of the DC, as seen from across the lagoon. It’ll hopefully probably be low enough to as not block the facade much, if at all, as it passes directly in front.I'm all for a coaster, but I really, really hope they don't run it across the lagoon side of the Discovery Center and ruin that perfect view from the front of the park. I'm fine with it poking out along the side on either side of the Discovery Center, just have it hop over to the other side (if they're using the blank space on the Watering Hole side) on the Burger Digs side of the Discovery Center. Going over the main path a few times would be a fun way to add a little more excitement to the area.
I think that is a given so the coaster adds "kinetic" value to the location. Not much of a loss in my opinion, I like the view of the DC but am not in love with it. Still a theme park construct. Again IMO.I'm all for a coaster, but I really, really hope they don't run it across the lagoon side of the Discovery Center and ruin that perfect view from the front of the park. I'm fine with it poking out along the side on either side of the Discovery Center, just have it hop over to the other side (if they're using the blank space on the Watering Hole side) on the Burger Digs side of the Discovery Center. Going over the main path a few times would be a fun way to add a little more excitement to the area.