Universal's NEW Classic Monsters Series | Page 2 | Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
  • Home
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Account Upgrades
  • News
    Universal Studios Hollywood Universal Orlando Universal Studios Japan Universal Studios Singapore Universal Studios Beijing
  • Merchandise
Log in Register
What's new Search

Search

By:
  • New posts
  • Search forums
  • Account Upgrades
Menu
Log in

Register

Install the app
  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
  • Forums
  • Miscellaneous
  • Games, Movies & Sports
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Universal's NEW Classic Monsters Series

  • Thread starter Thread starter belloq87
  • Start date Start date Jan 28, 2019
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 2 of 6

Go to page

Next Last
T

Tobias

Webslinger
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
3,060
  • Jan 28, 2019
  • #21
Considering the 2017 Mummy was another prime example of trying to start a shared universe without understanding how the MCU successfully did it*, a shift to solo filmmaker-driven films is a very welcome decision.

While not everything Blumhouse puts out is good, one can't deny they've put out some gems and more importantly, their usual low budgets has made for a consistent string of profitable films. So if a film turns out to be so-so or a flop, it's not gonna' lead to a embarrassing write off. An with how much they put out, it'll allow them to also take a chance with bigger budget films.

*= Seriously folks, the blueprint is not that hard to follow. You start with a good film of one main character, and do a little tease at the end that there could be more to it. (eg, Iron Man) You then do films focusing on the other characters, maybe introducing a secondary character when appropriate and gradually building the over-arcing universe till you can do a film which brings them all together. It just takes time, and it can't be done in a few films or one. Though that last bit is where everyone else mucks it up as they clearly want it ASAP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RFRees, Clive and belloq87
jseal777

jseal777

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Jun 7, 2016
Messages
1,265
Age
33
  • Jan 28, 2019
  • #22
This is almost EXACTLY what I wished for when the Mummy flopped.I REALLY liked Upgrade. I thought it was a better "Venom" movie than Venom. So I couldn't be happier about that guy (forget his name) being attached to this. Also gives me faith that Universal believes in the monsters rather than throwing them away when mummy flopped.
 
  • Like
Reactions: belloq87
quinnmac000

quinnmac000

Dragon Trainer
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
6,518
Location
Seoul, Korea
  • Jan 29, 2019
  • #23
It also helps the people who were in charge are no longer in charge of Universal Pictures solely.
 
T

Tobias

Webslinger
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
3,060
  • Jan 29, 2019
  • #24
Almost forgot to add, I do agree to a extent that some of the properties could still work as a adventure film. An the freedom of tone and whatnot could help them pull that off. The Brendon Frasier Mummy's definitely worked as a adventure film, Dracula Untold...not so much.

As for Van Helsing, I'll admit that's a guilty pleasure of mine. It definitely has it's issues, bad/grating accents and all. On the flipside, there's a good Frankenstein and for me it has one of the best bipedal werewolf designs in film, and it's the best CGI werewolf on top of that. (I know it's not a Wolf-Man design, but personally I'm not big on the Wolf-Man look so I'll take the Van Helsing's werewolves any day.)

None the less, I would like to see Van Helsing redone, there's a good action/horror film with that theme.
 
belloq87

belloq87

Time Traveler
Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
8,732
Location
Universal Exports
  • Jan 29, 2019
  • #25
Tobias said:
On the flipside, there's a good Frankenstein and for me it has one of the best bipedal werewolf designs in film, and it's the best CGI werewolf on top of that. (I know it's not a Wolf-Man design, but personally I'm not big on the Wolf-Man look so I'll take the Van Helsing's werewolves any day.)
Click to expand...

The design of the werewolf in VAN HELSING isn't bad, but for me, the CGI ends up looking very cartoony. As all of the CGI in the movie does.

For bipedal werewolves that aren't on the Wolf Man side of the spectrum (i.e. truly a human/wolf blend), I probably opt for the design from THE HOWLING.

One of the great things about the werewolf - and why it's my favorite supernatural creature - is that there is so much variation possible, from your upright Wolf Men (Henry Hull in WEREWOLF OF LONDON, Lon Chaney Jr.'s WOLF MAN, Oliver Reed in CURSE OF THE WEREWOLF), all the way to the four-legged "hound from Hell" in AN AMERICAN WEREWOLF IN LONDON. And all the gradations in between.

It will be interesting to see how Universal chooses to approach the Wolf Man character, assuming they get around to another movie with him. I think the Rick Baker design in the 2010 version is about as perfect an update to the classic design as you could ever hope to see, but I doubt they'll just retread that again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clive and Mad Dog
quinnmac000

quinnmac000

Dragon Trainer
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
6,518
Location
Seoul, Korea
  • Feb 15, 2019
  • #26
Some clarification from Blum about the new Monster universe

I recently hopped on the phone for a chat with Blumhouse chief Jasom Blum and the producer clarified that he’s not overseeing a new monster universe for Universal for the time being, nor was that the path he wanted to take To the contrary, the studio is taking it one film at a time and, first and foremost, the project came about because Whannell came up with a great pitch.

“I don’t believe in saying “We’re going to do movies about this” and then trying to find a movie about it. So I didn’t believe in going and saying ‘I want to do all these movies’, and then try to find directors to do them. We have a director who… we’ve also done six or seven movies with, pitched us this spectacular idea about Invisible Man. We told him to write it, he wrote it, then we took it to the studio and said ‘We’d love to do this and this is what we would do with it,’ and they said yes. We’re definitely in our zone, I don’t know if it’s going to be strictly five [million]. It’s not going to be more than ten, I don’t think.””
Click to expand...
“It was like the Blumhouse version of The Invisible Man, it’s a lower-budget movie. It’s not dependent on special effects, CGI, stunts. It’s super character-driven, it’s really compelling, it’s trilling, it’s edgy, it feels new. Those were all things that felt like they fit with what our company does. And it happened to be an Invisible Man story, so it checked both boxes. And we responded to it because I think Leigh is just an A+ director.”
Click to expand...

Jason Blum on The Invisible Man & Making Universal Monster Movies | Collider


And it appears Universal is taking pitches for the Mummy reboot as well:
The Director of PUNISHER: WAR ZONE Just Pitched a New MUMMY Movie to Universal and Shares a Little Info
 
  • Like
Reactions: belloq87
belloq87

belloq87

Time Traveler
Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
8,732
Location
Universal Exports
  • Mar 12, 2019
  • #27
Apparently Armie Hammer and Alexander Skarsgård are Universal's top contenders for the title INVISIBLE MAN role, with Elisabeth Moss potentially being looked at for the female lead...

Invisible Man Reboot: Armie Hammer, Alexander Skarsgård May Star

I like Hammer. He'd be a fine choice.

The bigger story is apparently the revelation of the new pitch for the character: he's "Adrian Griffin, a billionaire (and sociopath) who developed an invisibility suit for the Department of Defense." I don't know how much I love that idea, which seems to veer more towards overt, modern sci-fi than the more classic "mad science" of the original tale, involving serums and potions and the like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RFRees and Sideshow Bob
Jamesh22

Jamesh22

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Mar 13, 2018
Messages
1,819
  • Mar 12, 2019
  • #28
belloq87 said:
Apparently Armie Hammer and Alexander Skarsgård are Universal's top contenders for the title INVISIBLE MAN role, with Elisabeth Moss potentially being looked at for the female lead...

Invisible Man Reboot: Armie Hammer, Alexander Skarsgård May Star

I like Hammer. He'd be a fine choice.

The bigger story is apparently the revelation of the new pitch for the character: he's "Adrian Griffin, a billionaire (and sociopath) who developed an invisibility suit for the Department of Defense." I don't know how much I love that idea, which seems to veer more towards overt, modern sci-fi than the more classic "mad science" of the original tale, involving serums and potions and the like.
Click to expand...

Agreed on all points.

I'd add they just need to concentrate on making good movies instead of some Marvel style universe. Get people excited about the classic monsters again and then you can think about some Mo-vengers style team up ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clive
Brian G.

Brian G.

Editor-in-Chief
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
27,416
Location
Orlando, FL
  • Mar 12, 2019
  • #29
I don't know why ya'll keep thinking Monsters are ripping off the MCU when the Monsters did it first. ;)

220px-Frankenstein_Meets_the_Wolf_Man_movie_poster.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sideshow Bob, jseal777, Clive and 4 others
belloq87

belloq87

Time Traveler
Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
8,732
Location
Universal Exports
  • Mar 12, 2019
  • #30
I don't know that anybody in here has ever implied otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jamesh22 and Andysol
Viator

Viator

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2013
Messages
23,424
Location
Seattle, WA!
  • Mar 12, 2019
  • #31
The vibe I get from that bit on the casting, seems to represent slightly what they may be wanting to do.

It seems like it's going to take it's own spin, while making it contemporary with our time.

It makes me think it won't be as..horror based, but slightly political and with a potential tragedy on what happens to Griffin when he first dawns the suit.
 
Legacy

Legacy

Superstar
Joined
Jul 27, 2015
Messages
10,569
Age
41
  • Mar 12, 2019
  • #32
I still want Spike Lee or Jordan Peele to direct The Invisible Man...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sideshow Bob
Clive

Clive

Dragon Trainer
Staff Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
7,016
  • Mar 13, 2019
  • #33
Armie Hammer is a great idea. I'm fine with them going the "invisible suit" route, which has some basis in the very entertaining "Invisible Agent."

Still cautiously optimistic. Leigh's scripts can occasionally suffer from stilted dialogue, but they almost always turn out rock solid when a capable director (i.e., he himself or James Wan) are behind the camera.
 
  • Like
Reactions: belloq87
Spaulding

Spaulding

Minion
Joined
Jan 23, 2019
Messages
618
Age
38
  • Mar 13, 2019
  • #34
Not sure how controversial this might be, but I thought Hollow Man was a decent take on the Invisible Man as a horror movie idea. I think making it less silly and Kevin Bacon-y and you have the potential for a decent horror.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheGentTrent, Jamesh22 and belloq87
Andysol

Andysol

Webslinger
Joined
Jun 21, 2016
Messages
3,861
Age
42
  • Mar 13, 2019
  • #35
Legacy said:
I still want Spike Lee or Jordan Peele to direct The Invisible Man...
Click to expand...

Why those two?

Jordan Peele would be good, but Spike Lee? That’d be a terrible choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sideshow Bob
Brian G.

Brian G.

Editor-in-Chief
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
27,416
Location
Orlando, FL
  • Mar 13, 2019
  • #36
belloq87 said:
I don't know that anybody in here has ever implied otherwise.
Click to expand...

Sarcasm, mate. :cheers:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sideshow Bob and belloq87
belloq87

belloq87

Time Traveler
Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
8,732
Location
Universal Exports
  • Mar 13, 2019
  • #37
Fallow said:
Armie Hammer is a great idea. I'm fine with them going the "invisible suit" route, which has some basis in the very entertaining "Invisible Agent."
Click to expand...

Your point about INVISIBLE AGENT is a good one, though I'd like to see this new version have a foot more firmly in that horror genre than that story.

Spaulding said:
Not sure how controversial this might be, but I thought Hollow Man was a decent take on the Invisible Man as a horror movie idea. I think making it less silly and Kevin Bacon-y and you have the potential for a decent horror.
Click to expand...

HOLLOW MAN is fun. Pretty impressive effects for its time, too.

Andysol said:
Why those two?

Jordan Peele would be good, but Spike Lee? That’d be a terrible choice.
Click to expand...

I'd happily take Jordan Peele on one of the future Classic Monsters projects. He loves the genre.

I don't know that Spike has ever professed any affinity for horror, though (he does have a ceremonial "Executive Producer" credit on TALES FROM THE HOOD).
 
JungleSkip

JungleSkip

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
22,245
Location
The Mushroom Kingdom
  • Mar 13, 2019
  • #38
If Peele ever does one of these, I want him to do Frankenstein or Creature from the Black Lagoon. Both of those really lineup with his storytelling sensibilities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andysol and Sideshow Bob
belloq87

belloq87

Time Traveler
Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
8,732
Location
Universal Exports
  • Mar 13, 2019
  • #39
JungleSkip said:
If Peele ever does one of these, I want him to do Frankenstein or Creature from the Black Lagoon. Both of those really lineup with his storytelling sensibilities.
Click to expand...

Tonally, I think he could be great for CREATURE, which is the one I'd envision as slightly more of a horror/adventure fusion with some humor (though erring slightly more towards horror than Brendan Fraser's MUMMY, for example). Based on GET OUT and early word on US, Peele knows how to bring in laughs without undermining the horror stakes.

As for a FRANKENSTEIN adaptation, there's one name I saw thrown out by an online writer that I actually think would be a brilliant choice: Damien Chazelle. All three of his directorial efforts (WHIPLASH, LA LA LAND, and FIRST MAN) focus on very driven and emotionally-complicated men whose work either undermines or serves as an escape from their personal lives. I think that perfectly describes Victor Frankenstein.

Chazelle also wrote the underrated Hitchcockian thriller GRAND PIANO and co-wrote 10 CLOVERFIELD LANE, so he's got genre cred. And WHIPLASH was produced by... Jason Blum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andysol
Clive

Clive

Dragon Trainer
Staff Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
7,016
  • Mar 13, 2019
  • #40
JungleSkip said:
If Peele ever does one of these, I want him to do Frankenstein or Creature from the Black Lagoon. Both of those really lineup with his storytelling sensibilities.
Click to expand...

I was about to say the same thing. I'd still be thrilled to see Peter Jackson's take on Creature from the Black Lagoon, but please give me Jordan Peele's Frankenstein. (And spare me Bill Conden's.)
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 2 of 6

Go to page

Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

  • saint.piss
    Halloween Horror Nights 2025 (USH) - Speculation & Rumors
    • Latest: saint.piss
    • 5 minutes ago
    Halloween Horror Nights 2025
  • PrimalScream1996
    Halloween Horror Nights 34 (UOR) - Speculation & Rumors
    • Latest: PrimalScream1996
    • 5 minutes ago
    Halloween Horror Nights 34
  • Freak
    Halloween Horror Nights 2025 (USH) - News & General Discussion
    • Latest: Freak
    • Today at 8:06 PM
    Halloween Horror Nights 2025
  • Parkscope Joe
    Disney Starlight - Nighttime Parade (Summer 2025)
    • Latest: Parkscope Joe
    • Today at 7:47 PM
    Magic Kingdom
  • saint.piss
    Wizarding World of Harry Potter - Ministry of Magic - General Discussion Thread
    • Latest: saint.piss
    • Today at 7:32 PM
    Universal Epic Universe

Share this page

Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • Forums
  • Miscellaneous
  • Games, Movies & Sports
  • Style variation
    System Light Dark
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2025 XenForo Ltd.
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…
Back
Top