Bringing Back Nostalgic Properties to Universal Parks? | Page 4 | Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
  • Home
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Account Upgrades
  • News
    Universal Studios Hollywood Universal Orlando Universal Studios Japan Universal Studios Singapore Universal Studios Beijing
  • Merchandise
Log in Register
What's new Search

Search

By:
  • New posts
  • Search forums
  • Account Upgrades
Menu
Log in

Register

Install the app
  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
  • Forums
  • Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Universal Orlando Resort
  • Universal Studios Florida
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Bringing Back Nostalgic Properties to Universal Parks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ragerunner
  • Start date Start date Saturday at 5:57 PM
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4

Go to page

Jake S

Jake S

Webslinger
Staff Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2023
Messages
3,340
Age
33
Location
california
  • Monday at 10:25 PM
  • #61
Nostalgia is a word used so broadly that it hardly means anything anymore. But we’re going to see more and more representation of older media as the profit incentive makes it increasingly difficult to get a non-sequel, non-IP film made.

And, as already noted, monoculture is long dead. I think you could argue that theme parks are one of the last widely shared cultural experiences left in the United States. And even that is under threat as regional theme parks go under and destination parks position themselves as luxury products.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GA-MBIT, soarinwithmolly, OrlandoGuy and 4 others
TheCodeMan95

TheCodeMan95

Webslinger
Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
4,925
Age
29
  • Tuesday at 8:01 AM
  • #62
Jake S said:
Nostalgia is a word used so broadly that it hardly means anything anymore. But we’re going to see more and more representation of older media as the profit incentive makes it increasingly difficult to get a non-sequel, non-IP film made.
Click to expand...
I agree - I think the term has become very overused. How old does something have to be to be considered "nostalgic"? Snow White was already nearly 2 decades old when Disneyland opened with a Snow White ride.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GA-MBIT, Mad Dog and Jake S
LPCaptainDeath

LPCaptainDeath

Shark Bait
Joined
Jun 28, 2022
Messages
280
Age
33
  • Tuesday at 11:45 AM
  • #63
quinnmac000 said:
This may be true but usually market research and surveys focuses heavy on what consumers want without looking into why and how they want it. An good example is surveys asking about IPs...do you want to see this fantasy IP and IPs like it come to the park....to what level would you like to see them. They typically never ask why someone why they want to see the IP and what about that IP appeals to them. It misses critical elements as well as sociological/psychological factors for certain IPs that are why certain IPs are popular which could turn a good land to an amazing land appealing even more so to non fans.
Click to expand...
This is a great example on how we end up with a Skibidi Toilet attraction that even God fears.

Jake S said:
Nostalgia is a word used so broadly that it hardly means anything anymore. But we’re going to see more and more representation of older media as the profit incentive makes it increasingly difficult to get a non-sequel, non-IP film made.

And, as already noted, monoculture is long dead. I think you could argue that theme parks are one of the last widely shared cultural experiences left in the United States. And even that is under threat as regional theme parks go under and destination parks position themselves as luxury products.
Click to expand...
TheCodeMan95 said:
I agree - I think the term has become very overused. How old does something have to be to be considered "nostalgic"? Snow White was already nearly 2 decades old when Disneyland opened with a Snow White ride.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I don't think we know what we're saying when we say 'nostalgia,' really. Not when the term itself is largely subjective as to the era the people using it are even referring when they say it. Are you talking about the 60s, 70s, 80s, or 90s at this point? There is room for specificity in a theme park without generalizing. We really should just be saying HISTORICAL at this point because properties like Ghostbusters, Back to the Future, JAWS, Star Wars, Snow White, etc. aren't just your average rose-tinted shades of "let Grandma/Grandpa revisit this" property; We're not talking guilty pleasures that barely scratched the surface of public perception nor sleeper hits no one saw coming, here. We're talking about the timeless existence of something with huge draw and incredible cultural -HISTORICAL- significance. There is room for things like this alongside brand new hits. We'll keep updating and recycling old and new, but let's not mistake it for 'nostalgia.'
 
  • Like
Reactions: UNIrd, GA-MBIT, soarinwithmolly and 4 others
Parkscope Joe

Parkscope Joe

Superstar
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
18,095
Age
38
  • Tuesday at 4:36 PM
  • #64
quinnmac000 said:
This may be true but usually market research and surveys focuses heavy on what consumers want without looking into why and how they want it. An good example is surveys asking about IPs...do you want to see this fantasy IP and IPs like it come to the park....to what level would you like to see them. They typically never ask why someone why they want to see the IP and what about that IP appeals to them. It misses critical elements as well as sociological/psychological factors for certain IPs that are why certain IPs are popular which could turn a good land to an amazing land appealing even more so to non fans.
Click to expand...

I mean, yeah, but market research covers more than just asking folks what they want to see. I was thinking about more in depth focus groups, access to data we don't have about sales/engagement, plus just the interests of the creatives. Based on Universal's past 15 years it feels like they have a good handle on why people like IPs and what they want in a land.
 
  • Like
Reactions: soarinwithmolly, rabbitsmoon, TheCodeMan95 and 1 other person
Mad Dog

Mad Dog

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
23,762
Location
Pittsburgh area
  • Tuesday at 4:44 PM
  • #65
Parkscope Joe said:
I mean, yeah, but market research covers more than just asking folks what they want to see. I was thinking about more in depth focus groups, access to data we don't have about sales/engagement, plus just the interests of the creatives. Based on Universal's past 15 years it feels like they have a good handle on why people like IPs and what they want in a land.
Click to expand...
I've taken many on line surveys from Universal over the years and most of them are quite extensive/in depth, plus they generally allow written input. Usually they've been confidential, and quite often the questions hint on the directions they might be going in relating to attractions, entertainment and hotel resorts. I think they get a pretty detailed look at what the general public might want. Then there's also the in park surveys, though less extensive than the online, that gives Universal a good snapshot of the good/bad/indifferent. I've taken Disney surveys, but they're kind of self fulfilled pre determined outcomes and don't have the in depth questions that I've experienced with Universal....And yes, that internal data they possess, is gold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GA-MBIT
GA-MBIT

GA-MBIT

Jurassic Ranger
Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2017
Messages
2,104
Location
Isle Delfino
  • Yesterday at 12:56 AM
  • #66
When I talked about I-4 billboards before, it wasn't a hypothetical.

GVI7mIDXUAAcw5J


This is new as of the last year, and is currently rotating alongside their Epic Universe HTTYD, Mario, and Frankenstein promos; as well as some JP T-Rex and JW Raptors, Shrek and Trolls, and Minions of course. None of these are small, niche properties; and just about all of them have had some new movie release within the last 5 years, besides Frankenstein.

People might not know Brody, Amity, Quint; maybe they haven't seen the film, or would find it boring; but they know that John Williams theme. They know the Dorsal fin sticking out of the water, and that poster art. They know the Shark, and to stay out of the water when it's near. It's iconic, it's recognizable, it's exciting, and it's specifically Universal. That's a huge win, especially for an IP that's been dormant since before the 90s.

BTTF and E.T. are similar, as neither have been capitalized on with sequels, spin-offs, reboots like Jurassic, Shrek, Minions. They've remained iconic despite that gap in relevance; and I don't think it's just nostalgia. I don't think people get "nostalgic" when a film references the Psycho theme during a tense or violent moment; or uses 2001: A Space Odyssey "Also Sprach Zarathustra" to show something grand and incredible, or when they quote Shakespeare in the script of a modern movie. It's all just a part of the American cultural tapestry. When you think of a Shark song, it's either Baby Shark or it's "Da Dum". When you think of a generic horror monster, you think of Universal's version of Frankenstein. Any flexible use of the word "Nostalgia" doesn't have to play a part at all, so long as the IP still speaks to the Cultural zeitgeist as powerfully as these properties have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: soarinwithmolly, DodgsonHere, LPCaptainDeath and 5 others
TheCodeMan95

TheCodeMan95

Webslinger
Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
4,925
Age
29
  • Yesterday at 7:39 AM
  • #67
When I hear "nostalgia" used in a negative context, it's typically associated with movies/shows. I think theme parks kind of exist in a universe (lol) of their own.

Disney is currently building a new ride in Paris based off of the Lion King - a 31 year old movie.
They opened Seven Dwarves Mine Train when Snow White was nearly 80 years old.

The difference of course, is that Universal has had attractions for these properties already. But - I think if Universal announced a new Jaws or BTTF attraction right now, it would receive nothing but positive feedback.

(and it's not like they haven't reimagined an IP attraction before..)
 
  • Like
Reactions: GA-MBIT, soarinwithmolly, mccgavin and 5 others
Wesker69

Wesker69

Dragon Trainer
Joined
Mar 17, 2015
Messages
6,706
Location
Sherman Oaks, CA
  • Yesterday at 12:13 PM
  • #68
TheCodeMan95 said:
The difference of course, is that Universal has had attractions for these properties already. But - I think if Universal announced a new Jaws or BTTF attraction right now, it would receive nothing but positive feedback.
Click to expand...
Except for both BTTF & especially JAWS, a new ride has very big expectations to fill. Japan having the last JAWS Ride sets those expectations even higher. (Of course Hollywood just needs to give us back the "tilting dock" & another new updated shark)

TheCodeMan95 said:
(and it's not like they haven't reimagined an IP attraction before..)
Click to expand...
Skull Island is terrible compared to KONGfrontation. But I'm biased towards physical sets vs screens lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheCodeMan95
GAcoaster

GAcoaster

Dragon Trainer
Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2012
Messages
7,296
Location
Orlando
  • Yesterday at 1:39 PM
  • #69
I feel like people romanticize past attractions beyond what they really were. Our memories are subjective and we tend to remember the "good" parts of things more than the reality of what was truly there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GA-MBIT, Legacy, soarinwithmolly and 3 others
Wesker69

Wesker69

Dragon Trainer
Joined
Mar 17, 2015
Messages
6,706
Location
Sherman Oaks, CA
  • Yesterday at 2:15 PM
  • #70
GAcoaster said:
I feel like people romanticize past attractions beyond what they really were. Our memories are subjective and we tend to remember the "good" parts of things more than the reality of what was truly there.
Click to expand...
Except.... The JAWS Ride was top tier perfection!

BTTF was an enjoyable simulator experience that was well put together.

Twister was better than Fallon. Enough said on that. Also flying cow.

Shrek was better than VillainCon. Seating > standing

Graveyard Revue & Earthquake were also top tier compared to the Disaster that is Supercharged
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpatulaShack and belloq87
UniversalRBLX

UniversalRBLX

Time Traveler
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
7,529
Location
Cabana Bae
  • Yesterday at 2:33 PM
  • #71
GAcoaster said:
I feel like people romanticize past attractions beyond what they really were. Our memories are subjective and we tend to remember the "good" parts of things more than the reality of what was truly there.
Click to expand...
I agree, however it really depends on the situation...

Some mediocre fan-favorite attractions deserve to be closed for better experiences (Energy Adventure for Cosmic Rewind, Studio Backlot Tour for Galaxy's Edge, etc.)

Meanwhile, there are fan-favorite attractions that are beloved by everyone, but its replacement ultimately ended up being better (Jaws to Diagon Alley, Tom Sawyer to Piston Peak).

However, there have been questionable times when a popular attraction is replaced with a sub-par experience (Great Movie Ride to Runaway Railway*, Back to the Future to Simpsons, Beetlejuice for F&F, etc.). Unfortunately, these are the decisions that end up causing fans to question any project that replaces it.

I'm all for progress/replacements in the parks, but they have to be better experiences than its predecessor.


*I like Runaway, but replacing GMR was not the right move.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GA-MBIT
Parkscope Joe

Parkscope Joe

Superstar
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
18,095
Age
38
  • Yesterday at 4:10 PM
  • #72
GAcoaster said:
I feel like people romanticize past attractions beyond what they really were. Our memories are subjective and we tend to remember the "good" parts of things more than the reality of what was truly there.
Click to expand...
Unquestionably, I do it too! That's why I think anyone wanting to bring back old attractions or old IPs are making a monkey's paw wish.
 
Mad Dog

Mad Dog

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
23,762
Location
Pittsburgh area
  • Yesterday at 4:28 PM
  • #73
Recall the end life of some of those attractions. They weren't being well attended. That said, some of the replacement attractions have not been as good as what they replaced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wesker69
mccgavin

mccgavin

Minion
Joined
Mar 24, 2023
Messages
611
  • Yesterday at 4:34 PM
  • #74
GAcoaster said:
I feel like people romanticize past attractions beyond what they really were. Our memories are subjective and we tend to remember the "good" parts of things more than the reality of what was truly there.
Click to expand...
Parkscope Joe said:
Unquestionably, I do it too! That's why I think anyone wanting to bring back old attractions or old IPs are making a monkey's paw wish.
Click to expand...
You might be overthinking this. My first visit to Universal Orlando was just a few years ago, and I never got to experience Back to The Future The Ride or Jaws. My desire to see them return with new attractions isn't based on memories of the original rides, but rather my love of the films they are based on.

I definitely feel there is a gap in the resort's attraction offerings, with some of their most popular legacy films not being properly represented in the parks (though Mega Movie Parade and Cinesational are a step in the right direction). Dark Universe shows some of these older properties have more to offer for the resort, especially since the Universal Classic Monsters are FAR older than any other property being discussed here.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: GA-MBIT, TheCodeMan95, Mad Dog and 5 others
Jake S

Jake S

Webslinger
Staff Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2023
Messages
3,340
Age
33
Location
california
  • Yesterday at 5:09 PM
  • #75
The Back to the Future ride needed to go. I understand why the Jaws ride went. I really like that Universal is willing to kill its sacred cows. But I think these movies, these stories, can still be great attractions. There’s no guarantee, of course, but I’d love to see Universal give these movies another go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DodgsonHere, greendude33, GA-MBIT and 1 other person
Wesker69

Wesker69

Dragon Trainer
Joined
Mar 17, 2015
Messages
6,706
Location
Sherman Oaks, CA
  • Yesterday at 5:16 PM
  • #76
Jake S said:
The Back to the Future ride needed to go.
Click to expand...
How Dare You Daredevil GIF by Marvel Studios
 
Jake S

Jake S

Webslinger
Staff Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2023
Messages
3,340
Age
33
Location
california
  • Yesterday at 5:43 PM
  • #77
Wesker69 said:
How Dare You Daredevil GIF by Marvel Studios
Click to expand...
the ride system needed to go in 2007. thankfully they took care of that when they added the simpsons!

crap
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Sad
Reactions: DodgsonHere, GA-MBIT, saint.piss and 1 other person
TheCodeMan95

TheCodeMan95

Webslinger
Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
4,925
Age
29
  • Yesterday at 6:13 PM
  • #78
mccgavin said:
You might be overthinking this. My first visit to Universal Orlando was just a few years ago, and I never got to experience Back to The Future The Ride or Jaws. My desire to see them return with new attractions isn't based on memories of the original rides, but rather my love of the films they are based on.

I definitely feel there is a gap in the resort's attraction offerings, with some of their most popular legacy films not being properly represented in the parks (though Mega Movie Parade and Cinesational are a step in the right direction). Dark Universe shows some of these older properties have more to offer for the resort, especially since the Universal Classic Monsters are FAR older than any other property being discussed here.
Click to expand...
You nailed it right here. I started going to Universal in 2016, so I have zero nostalgia for anything prior to that.

And I would absolutely LOVE to see a Jaws attraction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: belloq87, GA-MBIT, Jake S and 1 other person
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4

Go to page

You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

  • Clive
    Halloween Horror Nights 34 (UOR) - Speculation & Rumors
    • Latest: Clive
    • Today at 12:56 AM
    Halloween Horror Nights 34
  • Viator
    State of USH - What's Next?
    • Latest: Viator
    • Today at 12:23 AM
    Miscellaneous Universal Studios Hollywood
  • Wesker69
    Transformers: The Ride - 3D
    • Latest: Wesker69
    • Today at 12:11 AM
    Lower Lot/Studio Center
  • S
    Harry Potter & The Battle at the Ministry - Reviews, Photos & Media
    • Latest: simon
    • Today at 12:07 AM
    Epic Universe Reviews
  • UNIrd
    Epic Universe Food and Drink General Discussion
    • Latest: UNIrd
    • Yesterday at 10:45 PM
    Universal Epic Universe

Share this page

Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • Forums
  • Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Universal Orlando Resort
  • Universal Studios Florida
  • Style variation
    System Light Dark
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2025 XenForo Ltd.
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…
Back
Top