I just don't know why that would be a
bad thing, is my point.
Tons of people consider books like
Firestarter and
The Stand horror, because of its connection to Stephen King. But are they horror? Firestarter is a political thriller about a family with psychic powers, and The Stand is an epic fantasy about good guys and bad guys in post apocalypse America. Psycho is a mystery/noir, isn't it? Alien is just Sci-Fi. But they still get called horror anyways, because they're filled with weird, terrifying moments and plenty of body horror. Horror has a long history of harboring alot of movies that have setups similar to other genres.
I'm always sad when critics review a horror movie I like and pull the old "it's actually a thriller, so it's okay to enjoy it." It can be horror too. There were people calling IT a thriller, like honestly. So I don't get why we don't try and take an expansive view of what horror is. True, Game of Thrones isn't the first thing that pops into mind when you think horror, but it's not like it wasn't there.
Plenty of
articles have pointed out that the last season was essentially a massive horror movie for a full half of its length. Genre is fluid as all hell, so I don't see why good moments of horror that show up in other media shouldn't be represented, especially when it's such a huge part of the show (and
especially especially when it was the
only good part of the final season of said show).