- Nov 3, 2015
- 2,198
- 3,693
Could it be Last of Us? Back into the video game space, horror adjacent, pretty popular.
But how do you strip away the cartoon aesthetic and still fulfill the contract with the IP holder? It’s one thing to do an original house based on a concept like Among Us and map it onto a different aesthetic but the rights holder might be pissed if their characters look nothing like the game (ie the Scream fiasco).
Also, why bother putting this much work into licensing and creating a house that’s similar to other in house properties? Again, if the concept is similar to the Thing (1982) just do that and save the licensing cost!
Somehow I doubt this is the IP, but you’re right that it does check all the boxes.
Among Us as a house? Yikes that'd be pretty sus. Just think about how many 14 year olds are going to yell "AMOONGUS" in there.
I'm gonna be real: It's kinda discouraging to speculate and the IPs that people have seriously speculated on were Among Us, Scooby Doo, and Five Nights at Freddy's. If any of those come true, it will be as if the event is being organized by some 14 year old who went to HHN for the first time hyped up on Monster and Snickers bars and wanted to design the whole event.
I really don’t like how the word gate keeping is thrown around when discussing atypical IPs. There’s a difference between something that fits into the pillars of Halloween and Horror and something that doesn’t.
Good example with KKFoS being subjective based on your experience with the property, but it’s still a cult classic horror film. Stanger Things is a newer IP that is a homage to classic horror films. It fits in.
I don’t think any die hard HHN fan is saying newer IPs can’t be at the event, but rather newer IPs should fit well with the event and not be such a stretch. Of course, that’s being idealistic and not realizing CREAM and that Comcast/Universal are corporate whores.
I just want some dates. It's unusual for them to be this late, isnt it?
Right. And the proof is in the pudding with Fear Factor widely considered the worst house of all time. Die hard HHN fans just want more horror. There are still bucket list IPs out there and interesting original stories to be told. I don’t think it’s gatekeeping when you know what HHN is capable of versus what’s decided upon for profit.I mean, this pretty much goes against the entire history of HHN tbh. The reason it comes across as gatekeeper-y when people have issues with properties with audiences that tend to skew younger/less male over how engulfed in the genre they are is because HHN has never been some consistent bastion for horror. Some previous house/street examples include:
The list gets even more off-the-wall when you include Hollywood who have had properties such as the WWE and This Is The End.
- Penn & Teller
- Fear Factor
- Marvel
- Alice Cooper
- Rob Zombie
- Cirque du Freak
We've had odd properties that don't fit neatly into a "horror" bubble and we've had musicians who utilize horror before. Alice Cooper & Rob Zombie never saw the amount of backlash that Billie Eilish had. There's also no reason why something like Five Nights At Freddy should be seen as odd when it's a horror video game and we've had properties that are far less based in horror in the past.
This conversation happens annually. HHN has never been consistently horror-centric all the way across the board. It's a big goofy event that loves IPs that'll make money and push merch. Most of those have already been done at least once, so they're bound to keep getting weird with it from time to time as the years go on. I'm not very knowledgeable in many of the current suggestions and some are definitely a bit off-base, but there definitely is some undeniable gatekeeping in the community as well.
Someone like Eilish just does what her marketing team tells her to do, which is why her house didn’t happen at HHN 30… “Sorry Billie, you’re going to be blonde and wear make up now, can’t have you doing a horror-adjacent haunted house confusing people about the marketing of your image!”
See, but this right here is inherently where the gatekeeping is. Eilish's whole first album era surrounded a horror aesthetic that her, not her label, came up with.I always find it amusing people bring up Rob Zombie when we have this debate. The dude lives and breathes horror and Halloween - an actual horror director that makes horror themed shock rock (which BTW I never liked until the Hellbilly Deluxe zone…now I love that album). Someone like Eilish just does what her marketing team tells her to do, which is why her house didn’t happen at HHN 30… “Sorry Billie, you’re going to be blonde and wear make up now, can’t have you doing a horror-adjacent haunted house confusing people about the marketing of your image!”
Peele and McBride created horror films. I agree that Eillish’s imagery would have been cool for a house, but it’s a stretch. These “horror-adjacent” houses have been poor to mediocre at best, including Alice Cooper whose live shows are filled with the horror genre. I also heard the “This Is The End” house was pretty bad too. I don’t blame fans for getting annoyed hearing about “horror adjacent” IPs given the house quality for past properties. Hell, even the video game IPs we’ve had were pretty awful.See, but this right here is inherently where the gatekeeping is. Eilish's whole first album era surrounded a horror aesthetic that her, not her label, came up with.
The credits for basically every song on that album are exclusively her & her brother, not some cowriters that the label supplied. Most sources seem to credit her horror-based music video concepts to her. Etc.
Hell, even the blonde transition you're referring to was her idea by all accounts.
You have quite literally nothing to base this on other than your own assumptions. There were endless posts back in 2020 explaining how in-depth she got with horror in that era and how it was controlled by her. Weird accusations like this are what make it gatekeeping. An artist doesn't have to live and breathe horror to be relevant to that sphere. Same goes for properties like Us. Are they not HHN appropriate because creators such as Jordan Peele also spent an era of his life doing comedy instead of horror? What about Halloween 2018/Halloween Kills? Do we not want that because Danny McBride spent most of his career doing comedy rather than engulfing himself strictly in horror?
Could you imagine a Tool house?Still waiting on my Primus house….. :ninja:
Real talk tho, it’s probably gonna be a house based on some TikTok trend none of us out-of-touch nerds will even know yet, haha. And if it makes a good house, that’s fine by me!
Could you imagine a Tool house?
So that rules out FNaF and Among Us (PHEW)From my understanding, the IP in question is not a video game.