I guess, if you like non-descript coasters themed to India or whateverIs Everest not better in a mountain?
I guess, if you like non-descript coasters themed to India or whateverIs Everest not better in a mountain?
Exactly. Also hate the excuse of well they ripped out two coasters with DC so this is just replacing that. I know DC had structural issues, but it was also an eyesore and theme mess. So doing the same exact thing in JP just because is why people complain.I thought it was pretty clear what he said.
If you take the exact same coaster and theme the hell out of it, would it not be better? Is Everest not better in a mountain? Is Big Thunder not better with its theming?
A mountain and/or loads of rockeork would’ve been great. The time frame and budget doesn’t allow for that. It is what it is, and that’s ok.
Yes, this thing will be a relatively basic, damn fun, thrilling coaster. That’s fine. But to pretend it couldn’t be better and to dismiss any thought it could be is laughable.
In the case of tourists to 'Orlando', I agree. Most of the areas that the bulk of tourists come from are close to the regional parks that are continually adding new coasters. No reason for a trip to Orlando just to catch a basically non themed coaster. But I do think a new coaster will spur attendance from central Florida locals. They'll flock to the park for it, and I'd guess it would help increase AP sales too.A very small crowd comes specifically for coasters. For new attractions/lands, big crowds, but coasters just for the sake of "new coaster", "first", "longest", "tallest", "fastest", etc, it's really just a small crowd that plans on a visit just for that coaster. It might help influence an overall decision of going to a park or not, but only the die hard enthusiasts plan a trip based solely on one coaster.
In all seriousness, I'm expecting this coaster to be much better landscaped and rock worked than DDExactly. Also hate the excuse of well they ripped out two coasters with DC so this is just replacing that. I know DC had structural issues, but it was also an eyesore and theme mess. So doing the same exact thing in JP just because is why people complain.
Of course, but as discussed here it’s still going to be just exposed track in places.In all seriousness, I'm expecting this coaster to be much better landscaped and rock worked than DD
Which is nothing new at Universal OrlandoOf course, but as discussed here it’s still going to be just exposed track in places.
Now it's time for the semi-annual reminder that families are not all 100% exactly the same. This adds variety, while people can also do the other things in the park while they're there.
For like a disneyquest style place? Great. For the themepark? NahRead over at screamscape theirs and article about possible expansion of Jurassic world even seeing a gyrosphere ride as a VR attraction how cool would this be?
Islands of Adventure
Ok....so the coaster itself hasn't even been confirmed let alone the layout and probably wont be anytime soon Speculation says maybe a show scene in the beginning of the coaster and no AA's mentioned yet i dont believe on the ride but maybe in the queueOk since I’m SO BEHIND. Is the coaster layout confirmed and will there be AA’s or anything besides just coaster?..Also why can’t we ever just get a new Dark Ride for an IP such as Jurassic Park?..It would be so awesome to get a JP attraction similar to Dinosaur in AK or Indiana Jones In Disneyland. In my opinion Universal needs more rides like those.
My fan base? Why you say that?God his fan base is so damn miserable.
I thought it was pretty clear what he said.
If you take the exact same coaster and theme the hell out of it, would it not be better? Is Everest not better in a mountain? Is Big Thunder not better with its theming?
A mountain and/or loads of rockeork would’ve been great. The time frame and budget doesn’t allow for that. It is what it is, and that’s ok.
Yes, this thing will be a relatively basic, damn fun, thrilling coaster. That’s fine. But to pretend it couldn’t be better and to dismiss any thought it could be is laughable.
Also why can’t we ever just get a new Dark Ride for an IP such as Jurassic Park?..It would be so awesome to get a JP attraction similar to Dinosaur in AK or Indiana Jones In Disneyland. In my opinion Universal needs more rides like those.
Permits show the coaster layout and the buildings that are associated with it. This includes a show-building on the first launch. Rumors indicate that show-building will include at least one animatronic.Ok since I’m SO BEHIND. Is the coaster layout confirmed and will there be AA’s or anything besides just coaster?..Also why can’t we ever just get a new Dark Ride for an IP such as Jurassic Park?..It would be so awesome to get a JP attraction similar to Dinosaur in AK or Indiana Jones In Disneyland. In my opinion Universal needs more rides like those.