How much longer can we play God without any consequences?The VR part snaps on with magnets and doesn’t actually touch your face.
How much longer can we play God without any consequences?The VR part snaps on with magnets and doesn’t actually touch your face.
There are no rumors for the attraction's storyline yet. Quidditch was one speculated concept, but I don't think it will be that.Is this still VR Quidditch? Or is it a VR Ministry attraction?
Really? Even a generic VR attraction? I would rather have FFL because at least I could dream that something better would take it's place.Putting aside the fact that I'm extremely curious to see how they pull it off, and knowing how immersive all of the prior Potter attractions have been I would certainly not count this out as up to those high standards, here's three thoughts:
1. Diagon could use a secondary attraction, (besides the train,) as Hogsmeade has several rides. Gringotts is still the main ride here.
2. Fear Factor plot isn't as big as one may assume, so this could be an attraction that packs the most bang for your buck in that space.
3. Literally anything is better than Fear Factor Live. Anything.
The word "generic" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.Really? Even a generic VR attraction? I would rather have FFL because at least I could dream that something better would take it's place.
Have you seen a POV of the new Cars attraction at DSP?3. Literally anything is better than Fear Factor Live. Anything.
Outlier.Have you seen a POV of the new Cars attraction at DSP?
I like fire.Have you seen a POV of the new Cars attraction at DSP?
1. Diagon could use a secondary attraction, (besides the train,) as Hogsmeade has several rides. Gringotts is still the main ride here.
2. Fear Factor plot isn't as big as one may assume, so this could be an attraction that packs the most bang for your buck in that space.
Lol FFL was certainly...a choice...It would just be a shame if we got a VR simulator in its place3. Literally anything is better than Fear Factor Live. Anything.
Putting aside the fact that I'm extremely curious to see how they pull it off, and knowing how immersive all of the prior Potter attractions have been I would certainly not count this out as up to those high standards, here's three thoughts:
1. Diagon could use a secondary attraction, (besides the train,) as Hogsmeade has several rides. Gringotts is still the main ride here.
2. Fear Factor plot isn't as big as one may assume, so this could be an attraction that packs the most bang for your buck in that space.
3. Literally anything is better than Fear Factor Live. Anything.
I mean, it’s quite feasible. In middle school (mid-nineties) I went to the Air Museum in Central Florida. They had a “dog fight experience” where twelve people “flew” in their own full-motion, one-person simulator against each other in a virtual dog-fight. It was low-res and strictly on a screen, but the combat occupied a 3D space.Quidditch is impossible. Even if the VR rides let you have a decent amount of interactivity, like Smuggler’s Run, this will still be an on-rails experience. The computing power to let people ply quidditch while on a motion base just is not feasible
I never would've said "anything is better than Disaster" though.All good points, Diagon definitely needs another ride/attraction and space as always is limited, but the last thought was made several times during Fast & Furious construction, now we're stuck with that abomination, on highly valuable, limited land (its a strong word I know, but I really cant stand that ride, what a waste of time, effort, money, talent, IP). Would seem a retheme of the stage area as a Wizarding battle in the alleys of London would produce quite a few butts in seats as well?
Switching up a little bit, what could be replacing this in Epic and why the change up?
I never would've said "anything is better than Disaster" though.
Not with that attitudeThe computing power to let people ply quidditch while on a motion base just is not feasible