Terrible collection of overall rides... not terrible collection of coasters. Hence why I said "outside of the coasters". Because outside of the coasters, the park has like 5-6 non-coasters (Bugs Bunny World does not factor into this due to it being for small children).
And I love how you guys are so invested being up Cedar Point's butt or other parks comparing them, when I just gave you new ride merch & Fright Fest pics.
And you mocked about half the merch you posted pics of. We're supposed to be grateful for that? ( Gross Prison orange, Crappy shirt I can get that made at mall?)
I did say I agreed with you about the lack of flat rides, which seems to be what you're saying. That wasn't really clear in your original post.
Let's all (including myself) face one thing... what's a "great", "good", "mediocre" and "terrible" coaster/ride is a
totally subjective thing. And rides/coasters are also built for different audiences. When I was 10, Goldrusher was the greatest ride ever. I still enjoy it now as an adult, but I'd currently put it in the "good" category. Still has a place in the park, because there are people who enjoy a milder thrill and is ridable for a wide age range, even if a seasoned thrill seeker finds it "mediocre". TC, as fun as it is, is
not a family coaster by any means. Thrill seekers may find it great, but there's also a whole lot of people who don't want to ride it at all--it's too intense for them.
I actually feel Lex Luther: Drop of Doom suffers from this as well... there are just too many people who flat out refuse to ride it. I seem to recall that was part of the reason SFMM introduced the VR to it... to make it more attractive to the average park guest, which may have been a coded way of saying, "less intimidating". Based on the anecdotal evidence I've heard, it seems to have worked... ridership is up as I understand it. A lot of thrill seekers thought this was a terrible idea (I thought so myself at first), but it has opened up the ride to a lot more people now, so they may have been crazy like a fox. Point is, what's "terrible" to one person may be great for another.
As a thrill seeker, I enjoy sustained speed over airtime... so I love Millenium Force. A thrill seeker who prefers intense air time is going to think MF is a waste, and from that point of view, I can understand that. I wouldn't agree, but I'd get it. But if anyone (and no one has, I'm just making an example here) said, "MF is terrible, as per usual from Cedar Point" and that's it, it comes across not very well thought out or argued at best, a bit spiteful and arrogant at worst.
We are all free to have our opinions. Where I have issue is anyone that makes sweeping, overly general statements without any support. I don't have to agree with your opinion, and you don't have to agree with mine, but I'd at least like to understand where we all come from.