I love them for doing it but no idea why Jurassic World in China is a million times better then the states since both parks you assumed would want to make the most amount of money they can....why do some companies invest but then the US parks don't are the US parks raking in Millions more a year from investing less?
I'm trying to understand why one place can spend what seems like a million times more and stay in business
I suppose I'd first argue that Jurassic World in Beijing, while extremely impressive, isn't "a million times better" than the offerings you'll find in the United States (assuming we're just talking about the peak that you'll find at the respective Universal parks). But, even if we accept that it
is substantially better, you just gotta look at who's footing the bill (a consortium that includes state-owned companies).
More broadly, the market in Osaka is different than the market in Paris than it is in Orlando. The United States is a remarkably wealthy country (although, of course, exceptionally unequally) and as such companies can charge significant significantly more than in other nations. That's an oversimplification, of course, but just keep in mind that while these are global brands, they serve local markets.
(To be clear, I also find it frustrating that Disneyland is three times the price of its Japanese counterparts, but comparing the resorts business practices is a bit apples to oranges, if that makes sense)