Toy Story 4 | Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
  • Home
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Account Upgrades
  • News
    Universal Studios Hollywood Universal Orlando Universal Studios Japan Universal Studios Singapore Universal Studios Beijing
  • Merchandise
Log in Register
What's new Search

Search

By:
  • New posts
  • Search forums
  • Account Upgrades
Menu
Log in

Register

Install the app
  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
  • Forums
  • Miscellaneous
  • Games, Movies & Sports
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Toy Story 4

  • Thread starter Thread starter Velociraptor
  • Start date Start date Nov 6, 2014
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2

Go to page

Next Last
V

Velociraptor

Rookie
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
37
Location
San Diego, CA
  • Nov 6, 2014
  • #1
Confirmed for 2017.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/11/06/toy-story-4-coming-in-2017
 
RonaldsModernLife

RonaldsModernLife

Minion
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
841
Age
34
Location
Brooklyn NY
  • Nov 6, 2014
  • #2
I know people are gonna crap on this, and yes Toy Story 3 was the perfect ending, but I'm looking forward to this. Would be nice to see another chapter of the story with the new owner. If the original cast and the Pixar dream team are a part of it, I fully support it.
 
April

April

Minion
Joined
Feb 11, 2010
Messages
731
Location
Orlando, FL
  • Nov 6, 2014
  • #3
I'm excited! I just wish they hadn't waited so long to decide. 2017's super far away.
 
JungleSkip

JungleSkip

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
22,245
Location
The Mushroom Kingdom
  • Nov 6, 2014
  • #4
Another unnecessary sequel from the former king of animated film
 
RonaldsModernLife

RonaldsModernLife

Minion
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
841
Age
34
Location
Brooklyn NY
  • Nov 6, 2014
  • #5
JungleSkip said:
Another unnecessary sequel from the former king of animated film
Click to expand...

Everyone thought Monsters University was unnecessary as well, but that proved people wrong. Personally, I like it better than Monsters Inc.
 
JungleSkip

JungleSkip

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
22,245
Location
The Mushroom Kingdom
  • Nov 6, 2014
  • #6
UniversalFreak said:
but that proved people wrong
Click to expand...

By being mediocre?
 
RonaldsModernLife

RonaldsModernLife

Minion
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
841
Age
34
Location
Brooklyn NY
  • Nov 6, 2014
  • #7
JungleSkip said:
By being mediocre?
Click to expand...

By getting positive reviews and being a box office success.

It's obvious our taste in movies differ, thankfully.
 
HalfGlass

HalfGlass

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Messages
1,342
  • Nov 6, 2014
  • #8
UniversalFreak said:
By getting positive reviews and being a box office success.

It's obvious our taste in movies differ, thankfully.
Click to expand...

To be fair, it wasn't critically hailed to the same level as Monsters Inc. It was seen as a step up from Brave and Cars 2, but falling short of greatness since it lacked the emotional punch (at least until the end) that Monster's Inc. did. I personally disagree, and think University is as good as Inc.
 
Teebin

Teebin

Veteran Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
20,673
Location
East Central Florida
  • Nov 6, 2014
  • #9
Isn't it interesting that Disney Animation is doing so well and Pixar is being kicked around like pathetic cash cow with a failing heart. Kinda sad and yet, other companies will step in and pick up the slack with wonderful new stuff.
 
RonaldsModernLife

RonaldsModernLife

Minion
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
841
Age
34
Location
Brooklyn NY
  • Nov 6, 2014
  • #10
tuc48038 said:
To be fair, it wasn't critically hailed to the same level as Monsters Inc. It was seen as a step up from Brave and Cars 2, but falling short of greatness since it lacked the emotional punch (at least until the end) that Monster's Inc. did. I personally disagree, and think University is as good as Inc.
Click to expand...

I liked University more than Inc. but that's besides the point. I just think it's funny when someone shoots out how a film is "unnecessary" before ANY information has been released about the film. Reminds me of the hate for Monsters University, which was Pixar's 2nd biggest first week box office release ever, and it also reminds me of how stupid everyone thought 21 Jump Street was...and we all know how that turned out.

Teebin said:
Isn't it interesting that Disney Animation is doing so well and Pixar is being kicked around like pathetic cash cow with a failing heart. Kinda sad and yet, other companies will step in and pick up the slack with wonderful new stuff.
Click to expand...

Like DreamWorks :look:
 
yankees13

yankees13

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
1,209
Location
New York
  • Nov 7, 2014
  • #11
3 ended it perfectly. Let's hope 4 doesn't make us act like it doesn't exist and is just as good. I trust these guys though and am sure it will be great. I grew up with these characters so to say I'm not excited about it would be a lie. I was 5 when the first one came out. But I'm still waiting for Incredibles 2!
 
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,221
Location
Orlando
  • Nov 7, 2014
  • #12
JungleSkip said:
Another unnecessary sequel from the former king of animated film
Click to expand...
Walt Disney Feature Animation has basically taken over as king again... and the funny part is because Lasseter has taken over the Studio with Non-Sequel content.

While WDFA has been thriving with Princess and the Frog (box office hit or not, it was a great movie), Tangled, Wreck-It Ralph, Frozen, and potentially Big Hero 6, Pixar has been doing probably 50% sequels of late, most of which have ranged from mediocre to bad (except of course TS3).

WDFA and Pixar are basically one in the same at this point in terms of look and who is making the movies, the main difference is Pixar making so many sequels. I'm looking forward to Inside Out, but we'll see. But you are right, Pixar is no longer king. Disney animation as whole is king, but Pixar singularly has gotten much worse as the years have gone on and Lasseter has increasingly worked with WDFA.
 
Last edited: Nov 7, 2014
shiekra38

shiekra38

Superstar
BANNED
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
16,111
Location
Florida
  • Nov 7, 2014
  • #13
Teebin said:
Isn't it interesting that Disney Animation is doing so well and Pixar is being kicked around like pathetic cash cow with a failing heart. Kinda sad and yet, other companies will step in and pick up the slack with wonderful new stuff.
Click to expand...

Well Disney animation had no other direction but up to go...Really, Disney Ani is only starting to return..Pixar has been going down hill for a while...they are quite full of themselves over there..

UniversalFreak said:
I liked University more than Inc. but that's besides the point. I just think it's funny when someone shoots out how a film is "unnecessary" before ANY information has been released about the film. Reminds me of the hate for Monsters University, which was Pixar's 2nd biggest first week box office release ever, and it also reminds me of how stupid everyone thought 21 Jump Street was...and we all know how that turned out.



Like DreamWorks :look:
Click to expand...

I would say Illumination is more up and coming than Dreamworks..my opinion though
 
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,221
Location
Orlando
  • Nov 7, 2014
  • #14
shiekra38 said:
Well Disney animation had no other direction but up to go...Really, Disney Ani is only starting to return..Pixar has been going down hill for a while...they are quite full of themselves over there..
Click to expand...
You do realize both studios are headed by the same person, correct? The same person who is "full of themself" at Pixar is helping create the hit films at Walt Disney animation.
 
Teebin

Teebin

Veteran Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
20,673
Location
East Central Florida
  • Nov 7, 2014
  • #15
Next Big Thing said:
You do realize both studios are headed by the same person, correct? The same person who is "full of themself" at Pixar is helping create the hit films at Walt Disney animation.
Click to expand...

I totally understand this. It is all about focus and spreading oneself too thin. Pixar's Planes and the Cars sequels are both examples of little thought for the product. Money was the primary goal.
 
Brian G.

Brian G.

Editor-in-Chief
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
27,152
Location
Orlando, FL
  • Nov 7, 2014
  • #16
UniversalFreak said:
Everyone thought Monsters University was unnecessary as well, but that proved people wrong. Personally, I like it better than Monsters Inc.
Click to expand...

I mean, in the grand scheme of things, it was. I enjoyed it for what it was, but it didn't really need a prequel. Same for Cars 2, Cars 3 and now Toy Story 4. Doesn't mean I won't see TS4 but TS3 was the perfect end for trilogy.

Pixar's Planes and the Cars sequels are both examples of little thought for the product. Money was the primary goal.
Click to expand...

Planes is actually WDA, just inspired by Pixar's Cars.
 
shiekra38

shiekra38

Superstar
BANNED
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
16,111
Location
Florida
  • Nov 7, 2014
  • #17
Next Big Thing said:
You do realize both studios are headed by the same person, correct? The same person who is "full of themself" at Pixar is helping create the hit films at Walt Disney animation.
Click to expand...

Different set of creative minds though..the guy that says yes/no on a project has little to do with the creative process (besides killing it and or approving it)...Disney Ani and Pixar are very different..Think Outback and Carrabbas..

p.s. sorry to make everyone hungry
 
Teebin

Teebin

Veteran Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
20,673
Location
East Central Florida
  • Nov 7, 2014
  • #18
BriMan said:
Planes is actually WDA, just inspired by Pixar's Cars.
Click to expand...

Ah, my bad. So both companies are ordered to spread themselves thin for the buck at times.
 
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,221
Location
Orlando
  • Nov 7, 2014
  • #19
shiekra38 said:
Different set of creative minds though..the guy that says yes/no on a project has little to do with the creative process (besides killing it and or approving it)...Disney Ani and Pixar are very different..Think Outback and Carrabbas..

p.s. sorry to make everyone hungry
Click to expand...
You mean John Lasseter? The Guy that started Pixar studios and was just announced to be directing Toy Story 4? Yeah, he has no say AT ALL. :doh:

- - - Updated - - -

Teebin said:
Ah, my bad. So both companies are ordered to spread themselves thin for the buck at times.
Click to expand...
Planes actually wasn't Pixar OR Walt Disney animation. It was Disney TOON Studios. The company didn't want the film to be listed on the roster of films for Pixar or Disney Animation. When the company is too ashamed to put the film on either of the top towo animation studios in the company, that's how you know it was a 100% cash grab.
 
Last edited: Nov 7, 2014
MrRoamer

MrRoamer

Jurassic Ranger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
2,399
Location
Local
  • Nov 7, 2014
  • #20
In my mind, Disney Animation's problem was always that they had no idea how to do 3d. They either ended up too stylized or too blocky with their models and animation, and it appeared that the story suffered either because of lack of time or that parts were avoided due to these issues. Once Pixar came into the fold that all changed, they now had one of the top CGI companies in the world working with them. They were taught new techniques and most importantly I assume given assets that Pixar had.

Planes was not a Pixar movie it was a Disney Animations movie, even though the assets are a clear evolution (I'm being generous here) from what was represented in Cars. The models are strikingly similar; lighting, rendering (RenderMan), and most importantly the shaders. This carries over to many of the other hits that have come out of Disney with Tangled and Frozen having very similar model styles to each other. Disney has always been able to create a story, now that the technical hurdles are being addressed by Pixar (as they have always excelled at) they can focus on what they do best.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2

Go to page

Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

  • S
    Six Flags Magic Mountain
    • Latest: Southerncoasterer
    • 4 minutes ago
    Other California Parks
  • PerceptiveCoot
    Avengers: Doomsday (2026)
    • Latest: PerceptiveCoot
    • 8 minutes ago
    Games, Movies & Sports
  • Wesker69
    Future of Jurassic Park River Adventure
    • Latest: Wesker69
    • 26 minutes ago
    Islands of Adventure
  • Mad Dog
    Universal's Epic Universe General News & Discussion
    • Latest: Mad Dog
    • 26 minutes ago
    Universal Epic Universe
  • Viator
    Nintendo Switch 2
    • Latest: Viator
    • 38 minutes ago
    Games, Movies & Sports

Share this page

Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • Forums
  • Miscellaneous
  • Games, Movies & Sports
  • Style variation
    System Light Dark
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2025 XenForo Ltd.
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…
Back
Top