Just my random opinion;...When it comes to opening a park of this prominence, I'd guess there's certain capacity guidelines, initial attendance projections, and ROI, that they look at. I don't think it's just coincidence that Shanghai, Beijing, IOA,
and Epic all seem to have similar numbers of major and secondary attractions. And slightly secondary projected attendance parks, like Hong Kong & Singapore, come in at a smaller number of attractions. AK is kind of
an outlier since it's as much zoo as a theme park. MGM/DHS wasn't really conceived as a full fledged theme park originally, so it's kind of an outlier also. Neither of those two parks have been able to get their attraction count
up to an acceptable level, since they opened at such a huge attraction disadvantage. ....If Epic opens like we think it will, capacity should be adequate at the least. And they do have all that expansion space available as the attendance increases
yearly. It doesn't make a ton of business sense to open a park catering to 15 million guests if you think your opening years will be in the 7 to 11 million range. Plus it's always good marketing to be able to advertise a new attraction, in an expansion pad, once every couple of years.