Care to elaborate?^ Ummmm, no. . .
Care to elaborate?^ Ummmm, no. . .
I would always love more Nintendo, but I think Animal Crossing deserves a Small World-style boat ride, and with a Zelda boat ride going in next door I'd rather see Toon Theatre get a show instead.A little Animal Crossing area, maybe with a very tiny dark ride, taking over the Toon Lagoon theatre area would be great. Great transition between TL and Marvel.
Sure!Care to elaborate?
Boy do they love marketing inside their parks with the giant "Over at the park" signs or the HHN commercials playing in the HHN queues lolUNiversal doesn't do more inside marketing because you are already there.
It’s probably a dinner show. Everyone enters same time. Everyone served at the same time. One show during the meal happens for everyone at the same time.
A complete dining experience, so not going to compete with the restaurants in the land.
Well clearly we are honored dinner guests, but Fluffy has broken into the school and is roaming the halls so the rest of the school is unsafe for the next hour or so until we can lull him back to sleep so we must remain in the great hall for our muggle safety.Now that I think about it, I guess the justification would be floo network? It would of course be funny when they tell you you can't explore the rest of the school, ha.
Yeah. I am expecting one of the following:Animal Crossing is probably too niche for a ride/land tbh, as much as I love it and would go nuts for it.
Of the 3, Pokemon would definitely be the biggest draw for the general public. (sorry Zelda fans)Yeah. I am expecting one of the following:
Zelda (if this isn't going in IOA)
Pokemon
Metroid
And there is a lot more potential interactivity with a Pokemon land. Anything between Pokemon GO! and SNAP!Of the 3, Pokemon would definitely be the biggest draw for the general public. (sorry Zelda fans)
And there is a lot more potential interactivity with a Pokemon land. Anything between Pokemon GO! and SNAP!
IMO Pokemon should go to USF whether it's a land, mini land or standalone ride. It balances out the resort better to have a Nintendo IP in all 3 of the parks. Plus once IOA gets Zelda Studios will be in need of something badly to draw more guests back to it.Of the 3, Pokemon would definitely be the biggest draw for the general public. (sorry Zelda fans)
I expect a full on E ticket for whatever they do there. Chaos, as well.Sounds like the ride they’re doing in Japan is going to be bonkers. Can’t wait to learn more.
Animal Crossing New Horizons outsold both of the best selling Zelda games?Animal Crossing is probably too niche for a ride/land tbh, as much as I love it and would go nuts for it.
Did it? I didn't realize that, but I was always assumed Zelda was a bigger draw in general.Animal Crossing New Horizons outsold both of the best selling Zelda games?
S-Tier: Mario and Pokemon. Nothing else they own can come close to the recognizability of these two. These should have no problem getting into the parks and making great lands.
A-Tier: Zelda, Luigi's Mansion, and Donkey Kong Arcade+Country. DKC would be C tier but gets the boost because of people's knowledge of the arcade game, the connection to Mario, and just how solid of an idea Mine Kart Madness is. A DKC subland is perfectly reasonable. Luigi is just more Mario, as well as being a solid ride idea. Zelda has always been a bit more niche than Mario, but is still one of the biggest and most recognizable gaming franchises out there. It might take longer than A-Tier but I don't doubt these will all be implemented somewhere in a big way.
B-Tier: Kirby, Animal Crossing. Recognizable and popular, but not nearly as much as S-Tier or Zelda. Kirby seems like the next thing after the Big 3, but I don't see a full land coming. Maybe a few off-the-shelf kiddy attractions and a Meet and Greet, but I suspect Universal will throw the bone to Illumination/Dreamworks before either of these get in. That said, a lot of merch will be sold of these, and they will probably be really popular M&G attractions if implemented.
C-Tier: Nothing really comes to mind. Most Nintendo franchises are either very popular or incredibly core and niche.
D-Tier: Metroid, Star Fox, Splatoon, Pikmin. Not popular/recognizable enough at all to justify a full land/ride over others but with just enough niche popularity to point them out above F-tier franchises. You might see a little bit of merch of these IPs, specifically Pikmin/Splatoon. I would be very surprised to see a Samus M&G.
F-Tier: Punch-Out!!, F-Zero, Mother, Xenoblade, Game & Watch, Fire Emblem, Kid Icarus. Incredibly niche and/or aging properties that often require longterm commitment with the game/series to have proper understanding of the IP. Very little to no icon status. You could make a wonderful BTTF-style ride based off of Kid Icarus or a really cool dinner-theatre experience with Punch-Out!!, but the audience is minimal and returns will be small. Merch will be nonexistent outside of trace references to the Switch, Wii, NES, and Game and Watch devices. If Samus doesn't get a M&G, what chance does Captain Falcon, Pit, Ness, or Shulk have?
I sadly agree with thisI don't think this thread is the right one for it, but if we're talking about it...
I think Nintendo lands will stop at Mario, Zelda, Pokemon, with the sublands of DKC and maybe a Luigi's Mansion expansion to SNW. We might see a regional Legoland-style Universal park a la Fresco incorporate some Kirby or Animal Crossing, but we are probably never going to see a Metroid or Splatoon ride outside of Japan, if ever.