JungleSkip
V.I.P. Member
If what is being implied here is accurate, Universal is way overthinking all this.
Why? Y’all always want more original stories
If what is being implied here is accurate, Universal is way overthinking all this.
Why? Y’all always want more original stories
Frankenstein Village | Horror Film Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia
And, likely said village. Buildings look even somewhat similar from concept art, and the windmill we can see. Exciting stuff.
The Dr. Frankenstein you’re thinking of won’t be creating new stuff.Personally, Frankenstein as a film was a massive leap for Universal that helped push the Monsters to become a massive brand for Universal Pictures. Seeing it get the main face as opposed to Dracula, is understandable in a few ways (to not confuse people with Hotel Transylvania, especially if most of the Universal Monsters will be represented); and it fits Murdy's love for the creature and said film.
Not to mention, it can be easily represented as a main attraction; with the vehicles being one of Dr. Frankenstein's newest creations (especially as it's seemingly being the 2nd gen of the Kuka Robocoaster system).
The plus of this is Frankenstein castle is beautiful. Now, for the Kuka arm, knowing it can grab from angles other than those used in HPATFB, how would y’all want it to be grabbed by? Dream ride vehicle/story?
The Dr. Frankenstein you’re thinking of won’t be creating new stuff.
Why? Y’all always want more original stories
As I said...Igor and the Son of Frankenstein (Wolf) taking over the lab? And Dr. Frankenstein and the creature trying to stop them?
I mean, the movie takes place in 1931. I'm fairly certain Dr. Frankenstein would be dead by now, and his son wouldn't be up for a high-speed thrill ride/chase through the castle and grounds.People are assuming we're visiting the castle *in the past.* Sons are so overplayed though.
How many theme park attractions pass the Bechdel Test?
I certainly don't want the main ride to be a "book report" style thing.
Well, three-quel.It’s not. Like I said, it’s an original story. Think of it as a sequel.
The 10 Most Beautiful Towns in Bavaria, GermanyThe "Present Day" thing is what's throwing me. What is gained by making the land -- which should be all about an "old world" sort of mood -- set in the modern day? What is the story justification for setting it now?
If there is no justification, why set it in present day at all? The original movies span GENERATIONS... yet always seem to occupy a very nebulous time period that never moves too far forward. The same approach could be taken here.
The "Present Day" thing is what's throwing me. What is gained by making the land -- which should be all about an "old world" sort of mood -- set in the modern day? What is the story justification for setting it now?
If there is no justification, why set it in present day at all? The original movies span GENERATIONS... yet always seem to occupy a very nebulous time period that never moves too far forward. The same approach could be taken here.
That is true, but it just leads back to my ultimate question... if the choice is not being made because of aesthetic reasons, why is it being made?
Note: I hope I'm not coming across as argumentative for the sake of it. I'm just extremely invested in what Universal is going to do with this land!