You actually know people that think these things? :stun:
Yes, I personally know people who truly think that. Fine with everything at Universal but won't do Potter at all.
You actually know people that think these things? :stun:
Just my opinion but Nintendo will have such a larger reach than the broom boy.Never said they wouldn't. My guess is Nintendo will do very well, but not in Potter's league. LOTR may never happen, and with Universal having so much on it's plate with Dreamworks, Potter & Nintendo, it might not even be feasible for the near future. so I won't speculate at this point in time.
Yes, I personally know people who truly think that. Fine with everything at Universal but won't do Potter at all.
You actually know people that think these things? :stun:
I believe the owner of the Orlando Parks News web site thinks that. He does his best to avoid posting photos of Potter areas and mentioning the name Potter. He has alluded to his opposition to the concept of Potter. As Scott posted. ...A real quandry for someone who has an Orlando theme park site.You actually know people that think these things? :stun:
Those people are legitimately out there. Living in the Bible Belt sure brings up a lot of awkward conversations with different families. Not a lie, when I was younger, I had a friend whose parents wouldn't let him watch Scooby-Doo because of its apparent supernatural effect on the young minds of children.You actually know people that think these things? :stun:
Yes, they are certainly out there, in more ways than one.Those people are legitimately out there. Living in the Bible Belt sure brings up a lot of awkward conversations with different families. Not a lie, when I was younger, I had a friend whose parents wouldn't let him watch Scooby-Doo because of its apparent supernatural effect on the young minds of children.
I believe the owner of the Orlando Parks News web site thinks that. He does his best to avoid posting photos of Potter areas and mentioning the name Potter. He has alluded to his opposition to the concept of Potter. As Scott posted. ...A real quandry for someone who has an Orlando theme park site.
Did Rowling have any help writing the screenplay? IMDB suggests not. I am concerned that it won't have the clever turns a pro screenwriter would add. Perhaps Yates had some input?
WB probably wants her listed as the sole screenwriter to win over the fanbase. And the WGA has heavily enforced rules about deserved credit. While she may have written it herself, she most likely got assisted in the basics of writing for film. WB, Yates, and Kloves may have read the script with notes and ideas, but she would still be credited as the sole writer. There is no way WB would invest tentpole amounts of money on a script from an untested screenwriter without guidance and support from the people already involved in the franchise.Steve Kloves wrote 7 of the Harry Potter films. He is also credited as producer on Fantastic Beasts (for reference he was not credited as producer on any of the Potter films, which means he must have considerable influence over the movie).Rowling is still credited as the sole screenwriter however.
Steve Kloves wrote 7 of the Harry Potter films. He is also credited as producer on Fantastic Beasts (for reference he was not credited as producer on any of the Potter films, which means he must have considerable influence over the movie).
Rowling is still credited as the sole screenwriter however.
Sorry to say but you work with serious nut jobs.Not all but some. But I know more who think Potter is the work of the devil yet fine with everything else as I work with quite a few.
Note to self: stay away.Virginia Beach area.
Thanks for this... now I can stop wincing and girding my loins. :look:
Sorry to say but you work with serious nut jobs.
Note to self: stay away.
Perfect analogy.They are good people....no Professor Umbridges, more misguided like Seamus Finnigan.
Has anyone told you, you write like you are a character in a Tennessee Williams play?
He has even said you'll never see pics of Haunted Mansion on the site so it's not just Potter.I believe the owner of the Orlando Parks News web site thinks that. He does his best to avoid posting photos of Potter areas and mentioning the name Potter. He has alluded to his opposition to the concept of Potter. As Scott posted. ...A real quandry for someone who has an Orlando theme park site.
He has even said you'll never see pics of Haunted Mansion on the site so it's not just Potter.
Now there's FantasylandHe has even said you'll never see pics of Haunted Mansion on the site so it's not just Potter.