Did anyone peep this article from themeparkjunkie.com?? Not running with this just Bringing it to everyone's attention..View attachment 1327
Lol trueEh, maybe, maybe not. But man that article could use a copy editor lol
Maybe with all the articles on how dirty and rusty hulk was, ride reliability, the roughness, the cracks, and universal in general tidying up the park just warranted it imo maybe.If that is true about the need to redo because of cracks and such, I wonder like how they knew now was the time to address it vs waiting a bit.
This is the second time I have heard about cracks and that is why they needed to do something. So I can believe that. But I can't believe the louder roar part based on all inside information about how sand will be added to the supports. I would think the reason for new supports was the fact that sand was needed to reduce vibration which would reduce stress and not cause the cracks. If you are replacing supports and the concrete, you might as well get smoother track too.
Does Kumba have the same set up without adding sand to the supports?
It's just dawned on me that Kumba is only 5 years older than Hulk. In my head Kumba has always seemed far older but then again Islands still feels like a new park to me.
Kumba is incredibly smooth, very well engineered ride. My favorite ride after Montu.Does Kumba have the same set up without adding sand to the supports?
It's just dawned on me that Kumba is only 5 years older than Hulk. In my head Kumba has always seemed far older but then again Islands still feels like a new park to me.
I couldn't find anything online to back this up, but one of my high school friend's dad worked on a crew that fixed/redid Kumba's footers. My memory isn't giving me exact dates but I was in high school from 1999-2003.I never heard of any structural problems with Kumba but then again I do not care about Busch gardens at all.
^ The back tracks were filled with sand right along. Not sure what to say about the cobra curl supports... if you did indeed see them.
I'd be very curious to know the volume of sand in the original back tracks, then, and if they were shipped filled or otherwise. They only have some of the supports in the back half plus that one single tall support next to the building up, nothing in the front half.
Yeah, we had pics of them cutting holes in the old track in the back to empty the sand out. Not sure if I recall the same for the supports. Do they fill the supports with sand on all coasters around the world as a general rule?