Definitely true, but I feel like you could confidently throw Amy, Tina, Will, Kenan, and friends in there and you’d be pretty set.The problem is the SNL cast is ALWAYS changing and as they are good with improv and sort of not afraid to say certain things or do certain things off-air (the post-show parties for SNL are known for being wild), I just feel like SNL lends itself better to being a club in CityWalk than a ride in a theme park.
Yes CLOSE THE THREAD.Sharknado: Ride It Out! In 6D.
Can we give someone from the newer hires of SNL a shot as well? I think Michael Che and/or Beck Bennett are heavy-hitters.I think a ride featuring (potentially) Tina Fey, Amy Pohler, Kenan Thompson, Kristen Wiig, Bill Hader, Will Ferrell, Kate McKinnon, Fred Armisen, Maya Rudolph, would be FUN.
I just saw the ride system manufacturer is suing Universal for money owed ($5 million ?!?). It came as a news flash from the Orlando Sentinel, but there's no link online yet.
I just saw the ride system manufacturer is suing Universal for money owed ($5 million ?!?). It came as a news flash from the Orlando Sentinel, but there's no link online yet.
Perhaps that's why we were hearing so many conflicting rumors, prior to and during construction, on which system/manufacturer the ride was. This might explain it.
Interesting story of the changes made in the process. Anyone know what Project 301 was supposed to have been?
Ride builder sues Universal Orlando, saying it’s owed $5 million for work on Jimmy Fallon attraction
Universal Studios’ Jimmy Fallon ride debuted in 2017, but behind the scenes, a fight over millions of dollars has gone on for years between the ride manufacturer originally hired to build the…www.orlandosentinel.com
Yes, I remember that speculation. There was a lot of Forum discussion on that back then. Ironically, F&F ended up in that Disaster space using the same layout and ride system that was used for the new Kong in IOA, though nowhere nearAccording to this old HateToFly article from the OU days, Project 301 was a ride set to replace Disaster. Interestingly, the info he had at the time lined up pretty well with Kong (Project 340) - so I'm not sure if he was just conflating two projects, or if Kong somehow began life as a FlyBoard/motion theater attraction and later grew beyond that scope and into the attraction we have today.
Word of Hatetofly: Return of the King | Orlando United
Could we be seeing the return of an original classic attraction at Universal Studios Florida?web.archive.org
Ah the old San Fran Kong discussion, I was on board with thatAccording to this old HateToFly article from the OU days, Project 301 was a ride set to replace Disaster. Interestingly, the info he had at the time lined up pretty well with Kong (Project 340) - so I'm not sure if he was just conflating two projects, or if Kong somehow began life as a FlyBoard/motion theater attraction and later grew beyond that scope and into the attraction we have today.
Word of Hatetofly: Return of the King | Orlando United
Could we be seeing the return of an original classic attraction at Universal Studios Florida?web.archive.org
So I jumped into this forum very late - was that original Kong attraction still supposed to be screen-based?
So I jumped into this forum very late - was that original Kong attraction still supposed to be screen-based?