Do you guys really want to piss off Shrek by putting a giant Star Wars hoverbike coaster right in his swamp?I think that's protected land and also a swamp lol
Do you guys really want to piss off Shrek by putting a giant Star Wars hoverbike coaster right in his swamp?I think that's protected land and also a swamp lol
Grain of salt obviously:
I don't hate it.
Grain of salt obviously:
I don't hate it.
Didn’t that feel magical to read?More timeless, more IP, more synergy, more Disney......
I had the thought that IS why he is gone. Stars aligned and he didn't like the struggle to get his way. He's been very vocal about why Zoo has no place in a zoo.Didn’t that feel magical to read?
I wonder if now that Rhode is gone Zootopia for AK is back in play. Belongs in MK or DHS.
Ya I wonder if Chapek is gonna piss off all top talent to leave. Not that Universal needs help clearly but I mean... a few phone calls may not hurt. Especially planning EU and beyond.I had the thought that IS why he is gone. Stars aligned and he didn't like the struggle to get his way. He's been very vocal about why Zoo has no place in a zoo.
Ya I wonder if Chapek is gonna piss off all top talent to leave. Not that Universal needs help clearly but I mean... a few phone calls may not hurt. Especially planning EU and beyond.
Not saying call Rhode specifically, but is Rhode the reason for over spending? I see that more as a higher up issue, where he is head of creative. Maybe I have a poor idea of his job. To my knowledge, he makes proposals, they give him cuts, he adjusts accordingly, and so on and so forth. I don't think he's the issue there but I may be wrong.My only concern if I were Universal would be the impact on the culture. Disney's budget overruns are not exactly glowing endorsements when taken in conjunction with the final products. I would focus more on the mid-level tiers or just stand pat with the team I already have.
Not Joe’s fault - it’s the culmination of years of no accountability for their overhead driven by the fact that WDI charges off all of its costs to sites. The big culprits are:Not saying call Rhode specifically, but is Rhode the reason for over spending? I see that more as a higher up issue, where he is head of creative. Maybe I have a poor idea of his job. To my knowledge, he makes proposals, they give him cuts, he adjusts accordingly, and so on and so forth. I don't think he's the issue there but I may be wrong.
It was always going toward new trilogy even before the film came out, but there was a probably misplaced notion that new trilogy would be just as successful over the long term as the old. In hindsight, where that went wrong was thinking that the new trilogy would make up 33% of the Star Wars anthology as opposed to the three new movies being a drop in the bucket of the entire Star Wars universe. Fans can just ignore them because there’s so much else to focus on.When GE was being thought up - they had just seen the immense success of Force Awakens and thought “man - people love these new characters”. They never could have predicted the divisiveness that followed with TLJ and Rise. So in a way - as much of a nerd as I am - I’d rather they go with loose canon like Harry Potter did. It will help the land age much better as time goes on.
Grain of salt obviously:
I don't hate it.
Seeing how they eventually added in/changed Star Tours from prequel to sequel trilogy WITHOUT removing prequel era theming, should give us an idea of what we could see happen to Galaxy's Edge as marketing shifts from new trilogy to new shared D+ universe.The Mandalorian and Favreau/Filoni's Universe to Replace Sequel Trilogy Characters in Galaxy's Edge?
The info is coming out of Lucasfilm fast and furious, and particularly from the Kathleen Kennedy side of things. I’ll be honest, I’ve got too many articles to write at the moment and too much stuff to corroborate to keep up. I think the amount of info being “leaked” is indicative of the Kathleen...www.piratesandprincesses.net
To bring up that article if anyone wants to take a read.
My honest take--comes to that I have believed that is the key for making Galaxy's Edge popular, is to not make it dedicated to one particular moment of Star Wars. This seems like an extremely logical move with the Sequel trilogy done and dealt with. Plus, when you are timeless, you are more synegetical. And in the process, you can market the land and attractions with the potential crossover with any future projects from Lucasfilm.
This brings up a question.
Was the location the problem or the timeline?
Well, tbh, that part of Galaxy's Edge already looks pretty close to that of the marketplace on Nevarro in Mando. What I don't get though is why they would replace Kylo's ship with the Razor Crest when the Razor Crest is already blown up. Although I guess I would be a sucker for a Mando-themed stunt show, so if we could get that, bring it on.FWIW, "WDWPro"--used to be on Magic, now on the Pirates & Princesses site--has a lot better recent track record than Jim Hill, and said largely the same thing. Handsome Josh tasked with adding characters from Mando ASAP, changes to Smugglers Run eventually when money available. He suggested RotR area may stay themed to sequel trilogy, with marketplace area becoming Mando-era, but not sure if that's a plan or just WDWPro spitballing.
Yeah, I would think they’d go with that other ship that recently appeared on the show at this point.Well, tbh, that part of Galaxy's Edge already looks pretty close to that of the marketplace on Nevarro in Mando. What I don't get though is why they would replace Kylo's ship with the Razor Crest when the Razor Crest is already blown up. Although I guess I would be a sucker for a Mando-themed stunt show, so if we could get that, bring it on.
Slave 1. It originally appeared briefly in Empire Strikes Back and was also in Attack of the Clones.Yeah, I would think they’d go with that other ship that recently appeared on the show at this point.
Slave 1. It originally appeared briefly in Empire Strikes Back and was also in Attack of the Clones.