- Aug 7, 2018
- 7,289
- 9,739
Veal. He’s brutal to the youth.Pork or lamb?
Veal. He’s brutal to the youth.Pork or lamb?
I have a feeling they are building him up, this is only the start. This could simply be the beginning of them starting an arc with Galactus. Where we first become fearful of him in the MCU. They need a big bad post-Secret Wars and Galactus is the perfect villain to fill that role.Why are we not building up Galactus…
Seems like such a desperate move.
Played a scientist in Oppenheimer, a political leader/mastermind of a criminal organization in Peaky Blinders, so if anything, risks being typecast.Either of those choices would be intriguing. But I'd probably go with Murphy as the top one. Doom needs to be somebody credible as a scientist, a sorcerer, and a head of state, and I think Murphy could convey all of that.
And that’s saying nothing about the unreleased 1994 movie lol.If this movie (or trilogy) doesn't work out, we just need to wait another 10 years for the next attempt
View attachment 20707
2035 cast will be Florence Pugh, Barry Keoghan, Asa Butterfield, and Travis KelceIf this movie (or trilogy) doesn't work out, we just need to wait another 10 years for the next attempt
View attachment 20707
See--the chatter if you look everywhere else is that you don't really need to "build" up Galactus.Why are we not building up Galactus…
Seems like such a desperate move.
Just a preference, Galactus should be built up as the eventual big bad.See--the chatter if you look everywhere else is that you don't really need to "build" up Galactus.
His simplicity is what is the most striking with him. And if we're considering a villain that should be more long-term; it should obviously be more Doom than Galactus.
I hope there’s a good reason for them because this film seems to be big enough as is in terms of cast size.Bummer, I've never liked the kids.