Of the parks history, harry potter has been apart of it for 10 years or less so it definitely is not what universal parks were built upon. is it popular, yes but not what makes universal Universal. What and who is to say there will by no well themed dark rides as we clearly see large buildings that could house them. Literally every property featured on the bluesky image is based on a movie so really, what are you trying to get at? and for their demographic, i see several thrilling rides that fit the bill. What I don't understand is how we can get on here and make it seem like universal parks always had rides like velocicoaster from their inception so now a new park has to have a potter area and a 200ft coaster. At one point, the most thrilling coaster at studios in orlando was a vekoma roller skater! And that opened 10 years after the park initially opened. Hollywood didn't get a "thrill ride" until 2004.
So again, tell me how this cannot be considered a "regular" universal when it has all the attributes of what a regular universal park opened with but just will be catering to young kids and families?