Halloween Horror Nights 31 (UOR) - Speculation & Rumors | Page 64 | Inside Universal Forums

Halloween Horror Nights 31 (UOR) - Speculation & Rumors

  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you not read anything you type about her at all before you hit Post Reply or are you still just that bitter she was almost included that you don’t care??

Obviously I’m very well aware that as “divisive as Eilish” is part of said clue that you’re trying to find the answer for that you’re not going to get officially until months from now. However what is not part of said clue are your deeply misogynistic comments negating her success, claiming her inclusion was the furthest thing from Halloween and horror when you should know well enough that’s wrong, etc., etc., etc. since. day. one. What I’m hung up on is constantly having intervene over your petty snide remarks. I am a fan and even I’m sick of talking about her here—yet you’re obviously not and you still can’t help yourself from stoking the flames, so if anyone is starting anything you should probably take a long, hard look at yourself in the mirror and, also, what you’re typing before you hit Post Reply.

Gender has nothing to do with this. I love Bjork and a lot of her imagery is horror-adjacent, especially her work with her ex-husband Matthew Barney. But if I heard a rumor that HHN was considering a Bjork house, I’d be like wtf that doesn’t fit in with the event despite my bias towards her.

You compare the Eilish situation to people like Rob Zombie or Alice Cooper. Those artists have music AND imagery related to horror and Halloween. While Eilish chose horror-like visuals for one album, the music didn’t match and the reason she didn’t come back was her second album cycle didn’t have any horror adjacent content. She even wore a wig to events to conceal her change of image. To me, it comes off as inauthentic.

While you presented a good example with Penn & Teller being far away from the concepts of horror and Halloween, the execution of the house played like an original B-movie horror/Sci fi concept. It was actually pretty fun and worked out well with the event although not a home run. I agree the Eilish house could have had some interesting design choices, but we’ll never know because she chose to do something different. Give me the opportunity to participate in designing a house and I’m doing ANY to make that happen.

Bring this back to speculation, I brought it up again because I feel like horror fans LOVE What We Do In The Shadows and this IP we’re discussing really has to create a similar knee jerk reaction to what Eilish brought to the community.
 
Joking aside it's really something I'd like to see. I think things get tricky separating anything involving pirates with Pirates of the Caribbean. If they're just living pirates then it just becomes Pirates of the Pancreas.

Roanoke and Lighting Gulch is both felt pirate adjacent in era to me
Plot twist: the “divisive” IP is actually a Pirates of the Caribbean house. They worked out a deal with Disney.
 
But if I heard a rumor that HHN was considering a Bjork house, I’d be like wtf that doesn’t fit in with the event despite my bias towards her.
I have no idea who that is, but I looked her up and she totally deserves an HHN house! I love that imagery, it's very reminiscent of Eilish and what I imagine her house would have been! Hopefully they'll consider doing an artist like her or Eilish again in the future.
 
Gender has nothing to do with this.

How I wish that was true.

I’m hoping now going forward that anyone thinking about adding unnecessary digs about her/her artwork from her previous album will kindly choose not to, and just stick to the topic of division. In regards to HHN, she’s currently irrelevant, so to keep addressing these type of barbs is exhausting and thread clogging.
 
...what if it's the Matrix? Extremely well-known IP with creepy agents and machine-things to create scares from, but also just had a divisive fourth movie stacked on top of two other divisive sequels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnathanm
How I wish that was true.

I’m hoping now going forward that anyone thinking about adding unnecessary digs about her/her artwork from her previous album will kindly choose not to, and just stick to the topic of division. In regards to HHN, she’s currently irrelevant, so to keep addressing these type of barbs is exhausting and thread clogging.
You clearly didn’t read my post. I gave an example of another female artist I actually adore and how it still wouldn’t be a good fit for HHN. Hell, I actually wish the Eilish house had happened for some of my friends who are big Billie fans. It’s easier for you to write me off as a misogynistic d-ckhead than to respect our difference of opinion.

I wouldn’t have even brought the subject up again had it not been for the clue saying the IP is as divisive as Eilish.
 
Last edited:
You clearly didn’t read my post. I gave an example of another female artist I actually adore and how it still wouldn’t be a good fit for HHN. Hell, I actually wish the Eilish house had happened for some of my friends who are big Billie fans. It’s easier for you to write me off as a misogynistic phallic noggin than to respect our difference of opinion.

I wouldn’t have even brought the subject up again had it not been for the clue saying the IP is as divisive as Eilish.
She shouldn't be calling you that, but both of you need to stop.
 
Last edited:
Not to add yet another name to the list of potential properties but...

-Both a TV show and movie
-Divisive to horror audiences
-Could be a headliner
-Being put out by a network with a strong working relationship with HHN

My question with this IP is, would we be getting the TV show (like Dusk Til Dawn) or original film?

Rookie also said we’re overthinking this, so it must be pretty simple.
 
It’s easier for you to write me off as a misogynistic d-ckhead than to respect our difference of opinion.

No, it's easy to write you off as misogynistic once you said misogynistic things. Trying to back pedal and say that just because you like a different artist who is the same gender or you would have actually liked the Eilish house to happen doesn't change that. Even on this page you're dropping lines about how her wearing a wig comes off as 'inauthentic'.

Just stop digging your hole deeper and try to be better. No one will say you can't be allowed a difference opinion. That's not what spewing hatred like some of the things you've typed is though, so don't try to mask it as such.
 
She shouldn't be calling you that, but both of you need to stop.

I never called him that, his comments negating her art however are misogynistic. He came up with that one all on his own.

You clearly didn’t read my post. I gave an example of another female artist I actually adore and how it still wouldn’t be a good fit for HHN. Hell, I actually wish the Eilish house had happened for some of my friends who are big Billie fans. It’s easier for you to write me off as a misogynistic d-ckhead than to respect our difference of opinion.

I wouldn’t have even brought the subject up again had it not been for the clue saying the IP is as divisive as Eilish.

I did read your post in it’s entirety but frankly it didn’t resonate with me because the second you said “gender has nothing to do with it” I checked out. If you truly believe gender has nothing to do with that, then due to a privilege I don’t have we will have to agree to disagree.

For the last time as this is, again, unnecessarily clogging the thread up, your own personal opinions on whether she belonged at HHN have absolutely nothing to do with the clue being about a divisive IP. You can discuss an IP being divisive without adding unimportant and uniformed commentary on the authenticity of her art. We debated that topic ad nauseam when she was going to have a house at HHN, now that she’s no longer a presence in the lineup, the topic of whether her inclusion is warranted or not is irrelevant. Please refrain from making said unnecessary digs in the future.
 
Not to add too much more fuel to this absolute trash can fire of a speculation storm, but I do feel like y'all stepped right over MiB when it was brought up...

It checks all the boxes (divisive among hardcore horror fans because it is horror adjacent, literally meta given the potential for proximity to the ride, not based on a video game, the list goes on), except for the potential to headline. I've seen the ride pull numbers, but I can say with confidence the average person isn't going to book a trip down based off of a series that arguably hasn't had a good entry since the original (...25 years ago)
 
No, it's easy to write you off as misogynistic once you said misogynistic things. Trying to back pedal and say that just because you like a different artist who is the same gender or you would have actually liked the Eilish house to happen doesn't change that. Even on this page you're dropping lines about how her wearing a wig comes off as 'inauthentic'.

Just stop digging your hole deeper and try to be better. No one will say you can't be allowed a difference opinion. That's not what spewing hatred like some of the things you've typed is though, so don't try to mask it as such.
Just reread my posts and never said a thing about gender.

Throwing around the term misogyny when discussing what fits and what doesnt at a Halloween theme park event truly reduces that term for actual real life misogyny - evil MFers wanting to take away women’s rights through pay inequality, the prohibition of reproductive rights, and silencing victims of assault and abuse. I am not one of those people.

I have also supported the idea of other non-cis male centric IPs at the event - Suspiria, The Boulet Brothers Dragula, Invisible Man, Midsommer to name a few.

This feels like the cult of celebrity hurling insults to protect its leader - a highly successful multimillionaire superstar. Never once did I punch down during this discussion.
 
Just reread my posts and never said a thing about gender.

Throwing around the term misogyny when discussing what fits and what doesnt at a Halloween theme park event truly reduces that term for actual real life misogyny - evil MFers wanting to take away women’s rights through pay inequality, the prohibition of reproductive rights, and silencing victims of assault and abuse. I am not one of those people.

I have also supported the idea of other non-cis male centric IPs at the event - Suspiria, The Boulet Brothers Dragula, Invisible Man, Midsommer to name a few.

This feels like the cult of celebrity hurling insults to protect its leader - a highly successful multimillionaire superstar. Never once did I punch down during this discussion.

We're not "throwing around the term misogyny", you've said blatantly misogynistic things. You seem to think that that just because you do x, y or z that it excuses some of the comments you've made or that it makes those comments you've made not misogynistic. It doesn't work that way.

Like I said before, stop trying to dig in and just be better. (For the record, the argument of "who cares about misogyny on these boards when it's so much worse in real life is a crap argument. It's awful there, it's awful here, let's not have it anywhere, okay?)
 
We're not "throwing around the term misogyny", you've said blatantly misogynistic things. You seem to think that that just because you do x, y or z that it excuses some of the comments you've made or that it makes those comments you've made not misogynistic. It doesn't work that way.

Like I said before, stop trying to dig in and just be better. (For the record, the argument of "who cares about misogyny on these boards when it's so much worse in real life is a crap argument. It's awful there, it's awful here, let's not have it anywhere, okay?)
You and Allison are throwing that term around and it’s immature and insulting.

I never said an IP house can’t exist because it’s a woman’s art. I pointed out why the IP was divisive in regards to speculating a new IP. I also posted about why it didn’t come back - a change in style and marketing. And yes, I mocked the decision because I thought it was a dumb one and her follow up to Where Do We Go… isn’t as good.

If Rob Zombie had a house planned but changed his look by cutting off his dreads, dying his hair blonde, and wearing a polo and changing his musical style to be a 1950s crooner, and that house got cut, I’d also think that was lame and inauthentic. And I’d mock him too.
 
You and Allison are throwing that term around and it’s immature and insulting.

I never said an IP house can’t exist because it’s a woman’s art. I pointed out why the IP was divisive in regards to speculating a new IP. I also posted about why it didn’t come back - a change in style and marketing. And yes, I mocked the decision because I thought it was a dumb one and her follow up to Where Do We Go… isn’t as good.

If Rob Zombie had a house planned but changed his look by cutting off his dreads, dying his hair blonde, and wearing a polo and changing his musical style to be a 1950s crooner, and that house got cut, I’d also think that was lame and inauthentic. And I’d mock him too.
I mean... several different people and many different likes seem to agree that you're saying misogynistic things. Maybe there's a reason.

You keep arguing that, but the Billie house wasn't controversial because of her look change. She was still in her horror era when the house was supposed to happen. The two are literally unrelated yet you keep correlating the two as if that's why people had an issue with it and why it was "divisive". It wasn't going to be the "furthest HHN has strayed from horror" going off every single leak out there. It fit pretty snug right in the horror realm yet you like to insist it's not simply because of the name attached to it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.