I hope we get some sort of Moana at Disneyland from this movie....its the least they can do for making such a....boring sequel to such a great film
There is potential... There is room for a Soarin' (or slightly bigger) sized show building right next to the Indy show building if the tram drop-off, Monorail track, the picnic area and some guest services are reconfigured (I'll get back to all this in a moment)....and if about 20% of Jungle Cruise is reduced through some shortening of route, some tightening of space/scenes (more narrow river channels between cliffs) and some indoor scenes (which would be an opportunity to bring in updated animatronics and special effects (I'll touch on this more below too).
The queue for a Moana "boat simulator" attraction would start at where the Tropical Hideaway is (the old Tahitian Terrace) and then follow a linear path (like Indy) along side the Jungle Cruise, out to the show building.
More details:
TRAM, MONORAIL, PICNIC, GUEST SERVICES: There is likely a lot of reconfiguration in the way guests get to the Disneyland Resort parks from parking in the future due to the Eastern Gateway, Disneyland Forward, and future development (whether hotel, retail, or a third gate) at the Toy Story lot (the old strawberry fields). The sprawling resort will need a re-invented transportation system (e.g., skyway, new People Mover), so change will be coming to the transport modes right outside the Disneyland gates regardless. Regarding the Monorail, specifically, Disney will one day substantially or completely remove the Monorail from the interior of Disneyland when Disney recaptures the 10 acres under the Autopia, Submarines, old People Mover tracks, and Monorail spaghetti bowl. (This area is 8% of the park with two attractions -- Submarines and Autopia -- and the issue is not so much capacity as together they accommodate 4,000 per hour, it's that they are space-hogs that don't create capacity-eating queues, or allow retail, and dining, nor do they drive Lightening Lane revenue, or highlight attendance-driving IPs. So, for example, a World of Frozen with two attractions will only match the hourly capacity on the current rides but will also accommodate up to 4,000 guests in the queues and more in retail/dining, where they will be spending money. The point of all this is that the Monorail's days are numbered inside the park, and therefore as a transportation "system" it will also be likely supplanted.)
The picnic area and guests services can also be relocated, and in fact many of the old ticket booths and other outside-the-park facilities will be relocated and be reconfigured as all the other park access-point changes.
JUNGLE CRUISE: The Jungle Cruise is a "Day 1" attraction and will never go away. But for the amount of space it occupies (around 3 acres, in a tightly packed park) it uses more space than can justified by its throughput (i.e., Piartes of the Caribbean has almost twice the capacity in half the acreage). The land-to-throughput inefficiency of Jungle Cruise is due to the scale...the boat is in a river wider than the boat and guests gaze toward "scenes" that are quite land-intensive, many far away. Meanwhile, the content of the scenes -- the animatronics -- are low-tech due to outdoor suitability. So, it is likely that a physical tightening-up of *some* of the attraction to create more narrow, intimate (and thrilling) scenes, will allow the recapture of some land. Indoor scenes would allow a few more sophisticated animatronics and controlled show lighting and effects, such as the kind of lighting effects happening inside the exploding lift hill of Big Thunder Mountain.