i called the shinning in my guesses awhile ago
just taking a wild guess but
-the shinning -
The Shinning confirmed.
i called the shinning in my guesses awhile ago
just taking a wild guess but
-the shinning -
It is not a King house.
It is not a King year.
I know, I know. Totally patting myself on the back here, but I thought I was being clever.I, too, have been hedging as to whether or not I should overlook this year's event, but it looks like I'll probably end up attending for my 14th year. I'm hopeful that my favorite icon, the Caretaker, shows up in some form this year.
It's just how I see it. Although yes, it's not an actual King house, it's using a film that loosely uses it's King story in way's. Now, some may see that as flawed; but until IT comes around for Horror Nights, that is the mindset that I am in right now.
That being said, I am excited to see how the Kubrick classic is tackled, and that I am interested to see if there may be nods to King in a way in The Shining itself, while staying true to the original film itself.
Also, one would assume that with a film like Shining, they'll use a controlled setting like one of the Soundstages, right?
This is where we part ways.I'll take a Stanley Kubrick house over a Stephen King house any year!
Same here/I'll take a Stanley Kubrick house over a Stephen King house any year!
They'll make a lot of people unhappy if they fail.Murdy said that he was going to announce a house early May so hopefully so both coasts do and it's probably going to be The Shining. I just hope that they do it justice.
The Shinning confirmed.
Any future King houses will also probably be based on movies rather than books.
They are going to base houses on movies not books... Despite which you prefer I'd be willing to wager many many many more people have seen the movie than have read the book or seen the miniseries, and yes there are huge differences, but they are not completely unrelated it's mostly the same story. Any future King houses will also probably be based on movies rather than books.
I think that just makes sense.
Honestly, I think it does not come down to familiarity so much as rights. King was a young and hungry writer when "The Shining" was made into a movie, so most likely he signed over a lot of rights. Since he hated that adaptation, he has guarded his work vehemently and been able to block haunted houses based on his works from coming into fruition. I have to imagine, from a contractual standpoint, he became smart enough to make sure this sort of thing could not happen AFTER he got burned by that one deal. After all, it reads as if Universal and Warner Brothers are bypassing him entirely in the making of this house, so it is probably something they are doing without his blessing, but within the boundaries of the law.