As much of a wet dream as it may be for some of you, Mack launch coasters are not the future of Orlando theme parks. Gotta think bigger and grander than that.
and very much so a wet dream for some of us.
:saywhat:
In the context of the discussion around IOA & Epcot. Besides, Slinky coaster isn't going to be anything like Blue Fire or Helix if that's what you're insinuating. It's a children's ride.
Sorry, I agree it should be a inventive moderate coaster with show elements- like the SFX and Mack inverted. And I knew what you meant and agree.In the context of the discussion around IOA & Epcot. Besides, Slinky coaster isn't going to be anything like Blue Fire or Helix if that's what you're insinuating. It's a children's ride.
So by that, what would stop Universal purchasing something between the two thrill levels?
Whilst I don't think they will go for something like this, I'd say it's pretty soon to rule anything out entirely...
I didn't mean literally a wet dream
Their desire for themed rides attracting an audience that will wanna ride the other HP rides, I highly doubt the DC replacement will have any inversions unfortunately. I would be pleasantly surprised if it did but don't think it will to try and keep the height requirement down. Will keep my joke suggestions of Mack coaster replacements to a minimum too and stay on topic even though that Helix ride was awesome and really used the landscape well.
Don't worry, I'm sure most of us aren't expecting anything along those lines haha. Who knows though, maybe one day we will see something... just not today
*rubs temples*
Calling that a family thrill ride with broad appeal is just incorrect - if not downright delusional.
Less than 30% of the park population is going to be willing or able to ride that sort of attraction.
Literal Wet Dream: The Ride 3-D
@Alexshow I like the way you think.